These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10442267)

  • 1. Using large-scale databases to measure outcomes in critical care.
    Pronovost P; Angus DC
    Crit Care Clin; 1999 Jul; 15(3):615-31, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 10442267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcomes research in gynecologic oncology.
    Melamed A; Rauh-Hain JA; Schorge JO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 146(3):653-660. PubMed ID: 28651803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes research using quality improvement databases: evolving opportunities and challenges.
    Ramachandran SK; Kheterpal S
    Anesthesiol Clin; 2011 Mar; 29(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21295753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data sources for heart failure comparative effectiveness research.
    Xian Y; Hammill BG; Curtis LH
    Heart Fail Clin; 2013 Jan; 9(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23168313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of databases for radiotherapy outcomes analyses.
    Jani AB; Davis LW; Fox TH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Nov; 4(11):825-31. PubMed ID: 17964505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Medicare claims data to ascertain peripheral vascular events in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Mell MW; Pettinger M; Proulx-Burns L; Heckbert SR; Allison MA; Criqui MH; Hlatky MA; Burwen DR;
    J Vasc Surg; 2014 Jul; 60(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 24636641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. All that is measured may not help.
    Gross M
    Can J Surg; 2000 Dec; 43(6):406. PubMed ID: 11129824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemiologic and statistical methods for comparative effectiveness research.
    Hlatky MA; Winkelmayer WC; Setoguchi S
    Heart Fail Clin; 2013 Jan; 9(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 23168315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using medicare databases for outcomes research in rehabilitation medicine.
    Chan L; Houck P; Prela CM; MacLehose RF
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 80(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 11399009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials.
    Bhaloo Z; Adams D; Liu Y; Hansraj N; Hartling L; Terwee CB; Vohra S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():33-41. PubMed ID: 27667370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
    Berger ML; Mamdani M; Atkins D; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 19793072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
    Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-provincial use of cardiac services: the importance of data-sharing for clinical registries and outcomes research.
    Humphries KH; Carere RG; Izadnegahdar M; Galbraith PD; Knudtson ML; Ghali WA
    Can J Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 21(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 15776116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National Databases for Neurosurgical Outcomes Research: Options, Strengths, and Limitations.
    Karhade AV; Larsen AMG; Cote DJ; Dubois HM; Smith TR
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Sep; 83(3):333-344. PubMed ID: 28950367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using secondary data sources for pharmacoepidemiology and outcomes research.
    Harpe SE
    Pharmacotherapy; 2009 Feb; 29(2):138-53. PubMed ID: 19170584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-world evidence in pain research: a review of data sources.
    Bellows BK; Kuo KL; Biltaji E; Singhal M; Jiao T; Cheng Y; McAdam-Marx C
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2014 Sep; 28(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 25136897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes research in pediatric surgery. Part 1: overview and resources.
    Abdullah F; Ortega G; Islam S; Barnhart DC; St Peter SD; Lee SL; Glynn L; Teitelbaum DH; Arca MJ; Chang DC
    J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Jan; 46(1):221-5. PubMed ID: 21238672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical outcomes research based on administrative data: inferior or complementary to prospective randomized clinical trials?
    Guller U
    World J Surg; 2006 Mar; 30(3):255-66. PubMed ID: 16485067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient Eligibility for Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine: An International Two-Center Observational Study.
    Ivie RM; Vail EA; Wunsch H; Goldklang MP; Fowler R; Moitra VK
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Feb; 45(2):216-224. PubMed ID: 27779514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.