These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10442412)

  • 1. Hand deviations toward distractors. Evidence for response competition.
    Welsh TN; Elliott D; Weeks DJ
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 10442412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goal-directed movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus.
    Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jun; 119(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 15877977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects.
    Meegan DV; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):225-49. PubMed ID: 9621840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of saliency on manual reach trajectories and reach target selection.
    van Zoest W; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt B):179-87. PubMed ID: 25536468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of near threshold visual distractors on perceptual detection and reaching movements.
    Deplancke A; Madelain L; Chauvin A; Cardoso-Leite P; Gorea A; Coello Y
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 104(4):2249-56. PubMed ID: 20702742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grasping remaps the distribution of visuospatial attention and enhances competing action activation.
    Colman H; Remington R; Kritikos A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1892-1908. PubMed ID: 27434754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tactile interference in visually guided reach-to-grasp movements.
    Kritikos A; Beresford M
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11976754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor effects on pointing: the role of spatial layout.
    Fischer MH; Adam JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 11291731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual distractors differentially interfere with the reaching and grasping components of prehension movements.
    Gangitano M; Daprati E; Gentilucci M
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Oct; 122(4):441-52. PubMed ID: 9827863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Dissociated effects of residual spatial neglect.
    Chieffi S; Gentilucci M; Allport A; Sasso E; Rizzolatti G
    Brain; 1993 Oct; 116 ( Pt 5)():1119-37. PubMed ID: 8221051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention is captured by distractors that uniquely correspond to controlled objects: an analysis of movement trajectories.
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):819-29. PubMed ID: 25465396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition.
    McSorley E; Haggard P; Walker R
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 19948108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of stimulus color on the control of reaching-grasping movements.
    Gentilucci M; Benuzzi F; Bertolani L; Gangitano M
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 11310170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From hands to feet: Abstract response representations in distractor-response bindings.
    Moeller B; Hommel B; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():69-75. PubMed ID: 26047973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outsider interference: no role for motor lateralization in determining the strength of avoidance responses during reaching.
    Menger R; Van der Stigchel S; Dijkerman HC
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 229(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 23811730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Looking away: distractor influences on saccadic trajectory and endpoint in prosaccade and antisaccade tasks.
    Laidlaw KE; Zhu MJ; Kingstone A
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1637-48. PubMed ID: 26838359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.
    Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 21507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.
    Song JH; Nakayama K
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):853-61. PubMed ID: 18262583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hand deviations away from visual cues: indirect evidence for inhibition.
    Howard LA; Tipper SP
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Jan; 113(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 9028783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.