179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10444737)
1. Reproducibility of lumbar spine range of motion measurements using the back range of motion device.
Madson TJ; Youdas JW; Suman VJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1999 Aug; 29(8):470-7. PubMed ID: 10444737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.
Kachingwe AF; Phillips BJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2347-53. PubMed ID: 16344034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength in patients with chronic low back pain.
Roussel NA; Truijen S; De Kerf I; Lambeets D; Nijs J; Stassijns G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 18374015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and concurrent validity of the BROM II for measuring lumbar mobility.
Breum J; Wiberg J; Bolton JE
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):497-502. PubMed ID: 8583171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of a system to measure passive tissue characteristics of the lumbar region during trunk lateral bending in people with and people without low back pain.
Gombatto SP; Klaesner JW; Norton BJ; Minor SD; Van Dillen LR
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(9):1415-29. PubMed ID: 19319764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values.
Ng JK; Kippers V; Richardson CA; Parnianpour M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11148646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of asymptomatic subjects' thoracolumbar range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer.
Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D; Hayes KW
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Oct; 20(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 7987381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.
Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D
Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10903583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of the modified-modified Schöber and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension.
Williams R; Binkley J; Bloch R; Goldsmith CH; Minuk T
Phys Ther; 1993 Jan; 73(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 8417457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of the assessment of lumbar range of motion and maximal isometric strength.
Roussel N; Nijs J; Truijen S; Breugelmans S; Claes I; Stassijns G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Apr; 87(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 16571400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic lumbar curvature measurement in acute and chronic low back pain sufferers.
Williams JM; Haq I; Lee RY
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):2094-9. PubMed ID: 22735170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.
Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Spineangel: Examining the validity and reliability of a novel clinical device for monitoring trunk motion.
Intolo P; Carman AB; Milosavljevic S; Abbott JH; Baxter GD
Man Ther; 2010 Apr; 15(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 19945335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normative values for active lumbar range of motion in children.
Kondratek M; Krauss J; Stiller C; Olson R
Pediatr Phys Ther; 2007; 19(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 17700353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and Comparison of Spinal End-Range Motion Assessment Using a Skin-Surface Device in Participants With and Without Low Back Pain.
Zafereo J; Wang-Price S; Brown J; Carson E
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2016; 39(6):434-442. PubMed ID: 27432028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of measuring iliac crest level in the standing and sitting position using a new measurement device.
Piva SR; Erhard RE; Childs JD; Hicks G; Al-Abdulmohsin H
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):437-41. PubMed ID: 12975630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
