These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10449115)
1. Line bisection performance of normal adults: two subgroups with opposite biases. Braun JG; Kirk A Neurology; 1999 Aug; 53(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 10449115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. McCourt ME; Jewell G Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right. Urbanski M; Bartolomeo P Cortex; 2008; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals. Fortis P; Goedert KM; Barrett AM Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2718-27. PubMed ID: 21663753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect. Na DL; Adair JC; Williamson DJ; Schwartz RL; Haws B; Heilman KM J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 64(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 9527144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect. Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space. Garza JP; Eslinger PJ; Barrett AM Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 18381226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Ghacibeh GA; Shenker JI; Winter KH; Triggs WJ; Heilman KM Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects. Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both. Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention. Lamb DG; Balavage KT; Williamson JB; Knight LA; Heilman KM J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30486914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Reuter-Lorenz PA Cortex; 2005 Aug; 41(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 16042026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Line bisection in normal adults: direction of attentional bias for near and far space. Varnava A; McCarthy M; Beaumont JG Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1372-8. PubMed ID: 11931941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention. Roth HL; Lora AN; Heilman KM Brain; 2002 Sep; 125(Pt 9):2023-35. PubMed ID: 12183348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Search patterns using the line bisection test for neglect. Kim M; Anderson JM; Heilman KM Neurology; 1997 Oct; 49(4):936-40. PubMed ID: 9339670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Line copying: distinct "where" and "aiming" spatial bias in healthy adults. Shah PP; Gonzalez KO; Barrett AM Cogn Behav Neurol; 2012 Jun; 25(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 22596108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]