BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10449609)

  • 41. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri.
    Nieminen P; Kallio M; Hakama M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1017-21. PubMed ID: 7770247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Duration of preclinical cervical cancer and reduction in incidence of invasive cancer following negative pap smears.
    van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 7635589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer prevention in Japan and Korea.
    Konno R; Shin HR; Kim YT; Song YS; Sasagawa T; Inoue M; Park JS
    Vaccine; 2008 Aug; 26 Suppl 12():M30-42. PubMed ID: 18945412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Epidemiology of HPV 16 and cervical cancer in Finland and the potential impact of vaccination: mathematical modelling analyses.
    Barnabas RV; Laukkanen P; Koskela P; Kontula O; Lehtinen M; Garnett GP
    PLoS Med; 2006 May; 3(5):e138. PubMed ID: 16573364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
    Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
    Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Risk of cervical cancer subsequent to a positive screening cytology: follow-up study in Finland.
    Viikki M; Pukkala E; Hakama M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):576-9. PubMed ID: 10929958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Age-related incidence of cervical cancer supports two aetiological components: a population-based register study.
    Seppä K; Pitkäniemi J; Malila N; Hakama M
    BJOG; 2016 Apr; 123(5):772-8. PubMed ID: 26599730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
    Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Am J Epidemiol; 1976 May; 103(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 1274953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Social differences in sexual behaviour and cervical cancer.
    de Sanjosé S; Bosch FX; Muñoz N; Shah K
    IARC Sci Publ; 1997; (138):309-17. PubMed ID: 9353671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Trends in incidence and mortality rates of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix--worldwide.
    Mathew A; George PS
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 19827887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Projections of cervical cancer mortality and incidence in New Zealand: the possible impact of screening.
    Cox B; Skegg DC
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Aug; 46(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 1431710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Estimating the impact of an organised screening programme on cervical cancer incidence: A 26-year study from northern Italy.
    Bucchi L; Baldacchini F; Mancini S; Ravaioli A; Giuliani O; Vattiato R; Falcini F; Giorgi Rossi P; Campari C; Canuti D; Di Felice E; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Ferretti S; Bertozzi N; Biggeri A;
    Int J Cancer; 2019 Mar; 144(5):1017-1026. PubMed ID: 30120770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cervical cancer screening. Past success and future challenge.
    Dewar MA; Hall K; Perchalski J
    Prim Care; 1992 Sep; 19(3):589-606. PubMed ID: 1410065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Selective screening for cervical cancer. Experience of the Finnish mass screening system.
    Hakama M; Pukkala E
    Br J Prev Soc Med; 1977 Dec; 31(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 597677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [In situ and invasive cervical cancer epidemiology in the province of Girona, Spain 1990-2004: incidence, mortality, survival and screening history].
    Castro Marqueta P; Moreno-Crespi J; Buxó-Pujolràs M; Cervantes-Amat M; Pérez-Gómez B; Marcos-Gragera R
    Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Feb; 136(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 21051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Organization and results of cervical cancer screening in the German Democratic Republic.
    Ebeling K; Nischan P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):251-66. PubMed ID: 3570410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: the Icelandic experience 1964-1993.
    Sigurdsson K
    Eur J Cancer; 1995; 31A(5):728-34. PubMed ID: 7640046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prevalence, incidence, and estimated life-time risk of cervical human papillomavirus infections in a nonselected Finnish female population.
    Syrjänen K; Hakama M; Saarikoski S; Väyrynen M; Yliskoski M; Syrjänen S; Kataja V; Castrén O
    Sex Transm Dis; 1990; 17(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2154865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.