These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10449841)

  • 1. Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel?
    den Boer KT; Herder JL; Sjoerdsma W; Meijer DW; Gouma DJ; Stassen HG
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Sep; 13(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 10449841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ergonomics and design of laparoscopic instruments: results of a survey among laparoscopic surgeons.
    Van Veelen MA; Meijer DW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1999 Dec; 9(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 10632508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An actuated force feedback-enabled laparoscopic instrument for robotic-assisted surgery.
    Moradi Dalvand M; Shirinzadeh B; Shamdani AH; Smith J; Zhong Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Mar; 10(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23640908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs.
    Eddie G; White S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Oct; 66(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8855921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
    Schaer GN; Koechli OR; Haller U
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The valve design of disposable and reusable trocars.
    O'Rourke NA
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb; 3(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7757439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tactile optical sensor for use in minimal invasive surgery.
    Fischer H; Trapp R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():623-9. PubMed ID: 10172852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems with laparoscopic instruments: opinions of experts.
    den Boer KT; de Jong T; Dankelman J; Gouma DJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2001 Jun; 11(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 11441992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The optimal mechanical efficiency of laparoscopic forceps.
    Heijnsdijk EA; Pasdeloup A; Dankelman J; Gouma DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Dec; 18(12):1766-70. PubMed ID: 15809786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Poulin EC; Julien M; Guidoin R
    AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 7574561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postural stabilization from fingertip contact II. Relationships between age, tactile sensibility and magnitude of contact forces.
    Tremblay F; Mireault AC; Dessureault L; Manning H; Sveistrup H
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 164(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15754171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sharp dissector as an aid to better surgical procedures.
    Perrill CV
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Apr; 142(4):589-90. PubMed ID: 1244192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The EndoHand: comparison with standard laparoscopic instrumentation.
    Jackman SV; Jarzemski PA; Listopadzki SM; Lee BR; Stoianovici D; Demaree R; Jarrett TW; Kavoussi LR
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1999 Jun; 9(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 10414542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ergonomic design criteria for a novel laparoscopic tool handle with tactile feedback.
    Mårvik R; Nesbakken R; Langø T; Yavuz Y; Vanhauwaert Bjelland H; Ottermo MV; Stavdahl O
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 17159752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disposable laparoscopic surgical instruments and the economic effects of repackaging.
    Takeuchi H; Kikuchi I; Kitade M; Kumakiri J; Kinoshita K; Takehiro Y; Tanimura E
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2005 Apr; 15(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 15898913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.