225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10450177)
1. Fully automated microvessel counting and hot spot selection by image processing of whole tumour sections in invasive breast cancer.
Beliën JA; Somi S; de Jong JS; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
J Clin Pathol; 1999 Mar; 52(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 10450177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationships between vascularization and proliferation in invasive breast cancer.
Beliën JA; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
J Pathol; 1999 Nov; 189(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 10547591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An improved procedure to quantify tumour vascularity using true colour image analysis. Comparison with the manual hot-spot procedure in a human melanoma xenograft model.
van der Laak JA; Westphal JR; Schalkwijk LJ; Pahlplatz MM; Ruiter DJ; de Waal RM; de Wilde PC
J Pathol; 1998 Feb; 184(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 9602703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Angiogenesis in breast cancer: a comparative study of the observer variability of methods for determining microvessel density.
Hansen S; Grabau DA; Rose C; Bak M; Sørensen FB
Lab Invest; 1998 Dec; 78(12):1563-73. PubMed ID: 9881956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hot spot microvessel density and the mitotic activity index are strong additional prognostic indicators in invasive breast cancer.
de Jong JS; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Histopathology; 2000 Apr; 36(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 10759944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heterogeneity and reproducibility of microvessel counts in breast cancer.
de Jong JS; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Lab Invest; 1995 Dec; 73(6):922-6. PubMed ID: 8558855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated quantification of proliferation with automated hot-spot selection in phosphohistone H3/MART1 dual-stained stage I/II melanoma.
Nielsen PS; Riber-Hansen R; Schmidt H; Steiniche T
Diagn Pathol; 2016 Apr; 11():35. PubMed ID: 27062658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitation of microvessel density in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck by computer-aided image analysis.
Erovic BM; Neuchrist C; Berger U; El-Rabadi K; Burian M
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2005 Jan; 117(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 15986592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microvessel area using automated image analysis is reproducible and is associated with prognosis in breast cancer.
Sullivan CA; Ghosh S; Ocal IT; Camp RL; Rimm DL; Chung GG
Hum Pathol; 2009 Feb; 40(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 18799189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Content-based analysis of Ki-67 stained meningioma specimens for automatic hot-spot selection.
Swiderska-Chadaj Z; Markiewicz T; Grala B; Lorent M
Diagn Pathol; 2016 Oct; 11(1):93. PubMed ID: 27717363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis.
Fox SB; Leek RD; Weekes MP; Whitehouse RM; Gatter KC; Harris AL
J Pathol; 1995 Nov; 177(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 8551390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An original approach for quantification of blood vessels on the whole tumour section.
Kim NT; Elie N; Plancoulaine B; Herlin P; Coster M
Anal Cell Pathol; 2003; 25(2):63-75. PubMed ID: 12632015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microvessel density counting in breast cancer. Slides vs. digital images.
Cruz D; Valentí C; Dias A; Seixas M; Schmitt F
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2001 Feb; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 11233738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of investigator experience and microscopic field size on microvessel density in node-negative breast carcinoma.
Vermeulen PB; Libura M; Libura J; O'Neill PJ; van Dam P; Van Marck E; Van Oosterom AT; Dirix LY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1997 Jan; 42(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 9138605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the manual, semiautomatic, and automatic selection and leveling of hot spots in whole slide images for Ki-67 quantification in meningiomas.
Swiderska Z; Korzynska A; Markiewicz T; Lorent M; Zak J; Wesolowska A; Roszkowiak L; Slodkowska J; Grala B
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst); 2015; 2015():498746. PubMed ID: 26240787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver Variability of Ki-67 Measurement in Breast Cancer.
Chung YR; Jang MH; Park SY; Gong G; Jung WH;
J Pathol Transl Med; 2016 Mar; 50(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 26875758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microvessel density in breast cancer: the impact of field area on prognostic informativeness.
Kraby MR; Opdahl S; Russnes HG; Bofin AM
J Clin Pathol; 2019 Apr; 72(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30630872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of a Histological Method to Measure Microvessel Density in Whole-Slide Images of Cancer Tissue.
Marien KM; Croons V; Waumans Y; Sluydts E; De Schepper S; Andries L; Waelput W; Fransen E; Vermeulen PB; Kockx MM; De Meyer GR
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161496. PubMed ID: 27583442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiogenesis in invasive breast carcinoma--a prospective study of tumour heterogeneity.
Ahlgren J; Risberg B; Villman K; Bergh J
Eur J Cancer; 2002 Jan; 38(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11750841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.
Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo LA; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Ehinger A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Laenkholm AV; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M;
Histopathology; 2019 Aug; 75(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 31017314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
