These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10450811)

  • 1. Option-4 algorithm for Florida pocket depth probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific probeable crevice depth measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers P; Johnson NW; Slaney R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 26(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 10450811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Option-4 algorithm for automated disc probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific relative attachment level measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 9182741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvements in methods of periodontal probing: comparison of relative attachment level data selected by outlier reduction protocols from Florida disc probe measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Johnson NW
    J Clin Periodontol; 2002 Aug; 29(8):679-87. PubMed ID: 12390563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sources of error for periodontal probing measurements.
    Grossi SG; Dunford RG; Ho A; Koch G; Machtei EE; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Jul; 31(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 8858537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
    Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
    Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of attachment level measurements with two models of the Florida Probe.
    Marks RG; Low SB; Taylor M; Baggs R; Magnusson I; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 18(10):780-4. PubMed ID: 1753003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-force periodontal probe modified to detect the cemento-enamel junction.
    Preshaw PM; Kupp L; Hefti AF; Mariotti A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Jul; 26(7):434-40. PubMed ID: 10412847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.
    Machtei EE; Norderyd J; Koch G; Dunford R; Grossi S; Genco RJ
    J Periodontol; 1993 Aug; 64(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 8410609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement by an experimental periodontal probe incorporating optical fiber sensor.
    Ishihata K; Wakabayashi N; Wadachi J; Akizuki T; Izumi Y; Takakuda K; Igarashi Y
    J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 21574830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discovering factors influencing examiner agreement for periodontal measures.
    Slate EH; Hill EG
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 40 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22369705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
    Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
    J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of tine shape of 3 periodontal probes using 2 probing forces.
    Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Reiker J; Loos BG
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Apr; 23(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 8739173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-time polymerase chain reaction quantification of human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in periodontal pockets and the adjacent gingiva of periodontitis lesions.
    Kubar A; Saygun I; Ozdemir A; Yapar M; Slots J
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Apr; 40(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15733143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of periodontal status with CPITN and conventional periodontal indices.
    Almas K; Bulman JS; Newman HN
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Oct; 18(9):654-9. PubMed ID: 1960234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multilevel analysis of factors affecting pocket probing depth in patients responding differently to periodontal treatment.
    Axtelius B; Söderfeldt B; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 26(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 10048639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.