135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10451671)
1. The realities of ethical review of research in Australia.
Pearn JH
Med J Aust; 1999 Jul; 171(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 10451671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions.
Blunt J; Savulescu J; Watson AJ
BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7124):58-61. PubMed ID: 9451273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Local research ethics committees.
Alberti KG
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7006):639-40. PubMed ID: 7549620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.
Lux AL; Edwards SW; Osborne JP
BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1182-3. PubMed ID: 10784542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Are ethical committees reliable?
Hotopf M; Wessely S; Noah N
J R Soc Med; 1995 Jan; 88(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 7884767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local research ethics committees. BMA's advice about approval of clinical audit studies is confusing.
Scott PV; Pinnock CA
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7099):60. PubMed ID: 9233350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study.
While AE
J Med Ethics; 1996 Dec; 22(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 8961122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The trouble with ethics committees.
Meade TW
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1994; 28(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 7802766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Two models of ethics committees.
Clarke S
J Bioeth Inq; 2005; 2(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16025620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital ethics committees in Portugal.
Bandeira R
HEC Forum; 1991; 3(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 10116452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research ethics review in Australia, Europe and North America.
McNeill PM
IRB; 1989; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Better research ethics committees: comments on guidance from the Department of Health and the European Community.
Diamond AL; Laurence DR
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1993 Apr; 27(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 8501672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
Bosch FH; Klazinga NS; Schaffmeister BE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Jan; 153(4):154. PubMed ID: 19348140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nurses' participation in the institutional bioethical debate in The Netherlands.
Prevos B; van der Arend A
HEC Forum; 1994 Jul; 6(4):235-56. PubMed ID: 10137306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Australian researchers accept committee review and conduct ethical research?
McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 1519084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional ethics committees in the Netherlands.
van der Kloot Meijburg HH
HEC Forum; 1992; 4(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 10120025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.
Foster CG; Marshall T; Moodie P
J Med Ethics; 1995 Aug; 21(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 7473640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How much influence do various members have within research ethics committees?
McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(4):522-32. PubMed ID: 7858751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethical review of medical research: a social movement to protect the interests of research subjects.
Osborne LW
Aust J Soc Issues; 1984 Aug; 19(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 11649620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
