129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10452216)
1. Event-related potentials and saccadic reaction times: effects of fixation point offset or change.
Spantekow A; Krappmann P; Everling S; Flohr H
Exp Brain Res; 1999 Aug; 127(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 10452216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.
Paré M; Munoz DP
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3666-81. PubMed ID: 8985865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reaction times of vertical prosaccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks.
Goldring J; Fischer B
Exp Brain Res; 1997 Jan; 113(1):88-103. PubMed ID: 9028778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey.
Dorris MC; Taylor TL; Klein RM; Munoz DP
J Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 81(5):2429-36. PubMed ID: 10322078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.
Fischer B; Weber H
Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 9655226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human express saccade makers are impaired at suppressing visually evoked saccades.
Biscaldi M; Fischer B; Stuhr V
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):199-214. PubMed ID: 8836219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. II. Pro-cues for anti-saccades.
Weber H; Dürr N; Fischer B
Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):417-31. PubMed ID: 9655227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Express saccades in cat: effects of task and target modality.
Baro JA; Hughes HC; Peck CK
Exp Brain Res; 1995; 103(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 7789428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential effects of target probability on saccade latencies in gap and warning tasks.
Dick S; Kathmann N; Ostendorf F; Ploner CJ
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 164(4):458-63. PubMed ID: 15864566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of the primate prefrontal cortex to the gap effect.
Tinsley CJ; Everling S
Prog Brain Res; 2002; 140():61-72. PubMed ID: 12508582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Saccadic reaction times and activation of the prelunate cortex: parallel observations in trained rhesus monkeys.
Boch R; Fischer B
Exp Brain Res; 1983; 50(2-3):201-10. PubMed ID: 6641855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task-dependent effects of social attention on saccadic reaction times.
Koval MJ; Thomas BS; Everling S
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 167(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 16283398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinct sensory- and goal-related signals underlie the gap effect in the superior colliculus.
Marino RA; Levy R; Munoz DP
Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 55(1):205-226. PubMed ID: 34791728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gap duration and location of attention focus modulate the occurrence of left/right asymmetries in the saccadic reaction times of human subjects.
Weber H; Fischer B
Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(7):987-98. PubMed ID: 7762155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural correlates of inter- and intra-individual saccadic reaction time differences in the gap/overlap paradigm.
Ozyurt J; Greenlee MW
J Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 105(5):2438-47. PubMed ID: 21346217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of ethanol on anti-saccade task performance.
Khan SA; Ford K; Timney B; Everling S
Exp Brain Res; 2003 May; 150(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 12698218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-unit activity in marmoset posterior parietal cortex in a gap saccade task.
Ma L; Selvanayagam J; Ghahremani M; Hayrynen LK; Johnston KD; Everling S
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 123(3):896-911. PubMed ID: 31967927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prestimulus cortical potentials predict the performance in a saccadic distractor paradigm.
Everling S; Matthews A; Flohr H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jun; 112(6):1088-95. PubMed ID: 11377269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response latencies and event-related potentials during the gap paradigm using saccadic responses in human subjects.
Gómez C; Atienza M; Gómez GJ; Vázquez M
Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 23(1-2):91-9. PubMed ID: 8880369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating the components of the gap effect.
Pratt J; Bekkering H; Leung M
Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 130(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 10672480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
