103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10452379)
1. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: I. Sinusoidal stimuli.
Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 134(1-2):89-104. PubMed ID: 10452379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses.
Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10491953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of electrode configuration on threshold functions for electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
Pfingst BE; Morris DJ; Miller AL
Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):76-84. PubMed ID: 7559181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats.
Smith DW; Finley CC
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2228-37. PubMed ID: 9348680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavioral auditory thresholds for sinusoidal electrical stimuli in the cat.
Smith DW; Watt S; Konrad KE; Olszyk VB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):211-20. PubMed ID: 7608401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval.
Pfingst BE; Morris DJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1287-94. PubMed ID: 8408969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.
Smith DW; Turner DA; Henson MM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):933-41. PubMed ID: 10687702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.
Schoenecker MC; Bonham BH; Stakhovskaya OA; Snyder RL; Leake PA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):655-72. PubMed ID: 22722899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tuning characteristics of cochlear nucleus units in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
Glass I
Hear Res; 1983 Nov; 12(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 6689010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):225-36. PubMed ID: 2076974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of level on nonspectral frequency difference limens for electrical and acoustic stimuli.
Pfingst BE; Rai DT
Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):43-56. PubMed ID: 2076982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from apical and basal perilymphatic electrode positions in the guinea pig cochlea.
Nuttall AL; Zheng J; Ren T; de Boer E
Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 152(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 11223283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
