These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10452380)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE; Holloway LA; Zwolan TA; Collins LM
    Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 134(1-2):105-15. PubMed ID: 10452380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants.
    Drennan WR; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15811709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Snel-Bongers J; Böhringer S; Timp GRFM; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31977727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Franck KH; Xu L; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Mar; 4(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 12118364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants.
    Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2000 Nov; 1(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 11545227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation.
    McKay CM; O'Brien A; James CJ
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):159-64. PubMed ID: 10511635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L).
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA; Litvak L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):623-6. PubMed ID: 16158620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Pfingst BE; Franck KH; Xu L; Bauer EM; Zwolan TA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 2(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 11550528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Claes A; Van Rompaey V; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e149-59. PubMed ID: 26583480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea.
    Lim HH; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Sep; 86(3):971-80. PubMed ID: 2794250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
    McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
    Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.