136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10452723)
1. Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality.
DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Harvey SC; Smith DN
Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 30(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 10452723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging appearance of noncalcified and calcified DCIS.
Scott-Moncrieff A; Sullivan ME; Mendelson EB; Wang L
Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):343-349. PubMed ID: 29139591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM
Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographically non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: sonographic features with pathological correlation in 35 patients.
Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Khetani K; Abdullah N; Joseph L; Kao E
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jun; 64(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 19414087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?
Komarla R; Gilliland L; Piraner M; Seidel R; Clifford K; Kunjummen J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211013. PubMed ID: 34870448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings.
Cho KR; Seo BK; Kim CH; Whang KW; Kim YH; Kim BH; Woo OH; Lee YH; Chung KB
Yonsei Med J; 2008 Feb; 49(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18306476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinically occult, noncalcified breast cancer: serial radiologic-pathologic correlation in 27 cases.
Stomper PC; Davis SP; Weidner N; Meyer JE
Radiology; 1988 Dec; 169(3):621-6. PubMed ID: 2847231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management.
Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radial sclerosing lesions of the breast: mammographic and pathologic correlation.
Hassell P; Klein-Parker H; Worth A; Poon P
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Dec; 50(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10659059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification.
Bagnall MJ; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Denley H; Geraghty JG; Ellis IO
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 11895299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.
Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Hwang ES; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 28705686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical presentation, imaging features, pathologic findings, and outcome.
Vieira CC; Mercado CL; Cangiarella JF; Moy L; Toth HK; Guth AA
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 19026501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography.
Hayes BD; Brodie C; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM
Breast J; 2013; 19(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 23600490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
