These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10453387)

  • 1. The Kodak approach to digital cardiovascular imaging laboratories.
    Pelanek GA
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 10453387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The DICOM review stations: are they truly different?
    Goedhart B; Brand GJ; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 10453384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Replacement of cinefilm with a digital archive and review network.
    Cusma JT; Wondrow MA; Holmes DR
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 10453381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated image storage solution for the Cath department.
    Weterings RA
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):349-56. PubMed ID: 10453389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The status of the GE approach to the digital catheterization laboratory.
    Herro PJ
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 10453386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The specification and evaluation of digital cardiac archive and review systems.
    Kennedy TE; Bergholz EW
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1996; 7(3):24-7. PubMed ID: 10158418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Camtronics experience with the filmless digital catheterization laboratory.
    Kapp MA; Vaughn ST
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 10453388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital networking and archiving with ACOM T.O.P.
    Saalfrank W
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 10453385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical importance of the DICOM structured reporting standard.
    Bidgood WD
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):307-15. PubMed ID: 10453383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The hemodynamics laboratory without cine film. A comparison between the production costs of 35-mm film and the recordable compact disk].
    Danzi GB; Fiocca L; Dallavalle F; Capuano C; Chioin R; Riva S; Quaini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 28(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 9773314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fraudulent retouching of digital radiographic images--a potential risk.
    Chang HJ; Oh SN; Park MY; Rha SE; Choi BG
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Dec; 65(12):967-73. PubMed ID: 21070899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative imaging technologies in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Condit PB
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1993; 4(5):19-20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10129576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations.
    Gürdal P; Hildebolt CF; Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11175274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression.
    Schreiber D
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 14603591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The DICOM-CD-Project of the German Radiology Association--an overview of the content and results of a pilot study in 2006].
    Mildenberger P; Kotter E; Riesmeier J; Onken M; Kauer T; Eichelberg M; Walz M
    Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 17492535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of commercial compression algorithms, of the lossy DCT and lossless types, applied to diagnostic digital image files.
    Okkalides D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1998; 22(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9745939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information management in the cardiology department. An analysis of current options for replacing cinefilm.
    Van Meurs BF
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995; 11 Suppl 3():159-63. PubMed ID: 7594744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital mammography: performance evaluation parameters and available systems in France].
    Stines J; Noel A; Heid P
    J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):933-42. PubMed ID: 17878849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American College of Cardiology, American College of Radiology and industry develop standard for digital transfer of angiographic images. ACC/ACR/NEMA Ad Hoc Group.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 25(3):800-2. PubMed ID: 7860933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression.
    Avrin D; Morin R; Piraino D; Rowberg A; Detorie N; Zuley M; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 17412135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.