1233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10453670)
1. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative clinical investigation of 2 early loaded ITI dental implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible.
Røynesdal AK; Amundrud B; Hannaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11324212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: results after 1 year of loading.
Hallman M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 11669256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study.
Capelli M; Zuffetti F; Del Fabbro M; Testori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 17929526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 5-year prospective multicenter study on 1-stage smooth-surface Brånemark System implants with early loading in edentulous mandibles.
Friberg B; Raghoebar GM; Grunert I; Hobkirk JA; Tepper G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18700372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year prospective clinical study of submerged and nonsubmerged Paragon system implants in the edentulous mandible.
Eliasson A; Narby B; Ekstrand K; Hirsch J; Johansson A; Wennerberg A
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 20552088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases.
Grant BT; Pancko FX; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 19304026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized multicenter comparison of 2 IMZ and 4 TPS screw implants supporting bar-retained overdentures in 425 edentulous mandibles.
Mau J; Behneke A; Behneke N; Fritzemeier CU; Gomez-Roman G; d'Hoedt B; Spiekermann H; Strunz V; Yong M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):835-47. PubMed ID: 14696659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study.
Heydenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 12814319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular fracture in conjunction with bicortical penetration, using wide-diameter endosseous dental implants.
Oh WS; Roumanas ED; Beumer J
J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):625-9. PubMed ID: 21054640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
