119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10454112)
1. Differences in whole body measurements by DXA-scanning using two Lunar DPX-L machines.
Lantz H; Samuelson G; Bratteby LE; Mallmin H; Sjöström L
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1999 Jul; 23(7):764-70. PubMed ID: 10454112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Cross-Calibration Study of GE Lunar iDXA and GE Lunar DPX Pro for Body Composition Measurements in Children and Adults.
Khadilkar A; Chiplonkar S; Sanwalka N; Khadilkar V; Mandlik R; Ekbote V
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 30981615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.
Crabtree NJ; Shaw NJ; Boivin CM; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2157-67. PubMed ID: 16234997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of body composition and bone mineral measurements from two DXA instruments in young men.
Modlesky CM; Lewis RD; Yetman KA; Rose B; Rosskopf LB; Snow TK; Sparling PB
Am J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 64(5):669-76. PubMed ID: 8901784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bone mineral density and body composition measurements in women obtained from two DXA instruments.
Gillette-Guyonnet S; Andrieu S; Nourhashemi F; Cantet C; Grandjean H; Vellas B
Mech Ageing Dev; 2003 Mar; 124(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 12663129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.
Laskey MA; Lyttle KD; Flaxman ME; Barber RW
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jan; 46(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1559506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.
Soriano JM; Ioannidou E; Wang J; Thornton JC; Horlick MN; Gallagher D; Heymsfield SB; Pierson RN
J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 15319498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens.
Swennen Q; Janssens GP; Geers R; Decuypere E; Buyse J
Poult Sci; 2004 Aug; 83(8):1348-57. PubMed ID: 15339010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Differences in Bone Mineral Density Measurement With 3 Hologic Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan Modes.
Yu W; Zhang Z; Pan W; Guan W; Lin Q; Xia W; Li T; Hsieh E
J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(4):645-650. PubMed ID: 33504451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two software versions for assessment of body-composition analysis by DXA.
Vozarova B; Wang J; Weyer C; Tataranni PA
Obes Res; 2001 Mar; 9(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 11323450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do Textiles Impact DXA Bone Density or Body Composition Results?
Siglinsky E; Binkley N; Krueger D
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):303-307. PubMed ID: 28988694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of in-vivo body composition using two Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Oldroyd B; Truscott JG; Woodrow G; Milner R; Stewart SP; Smith AH; Westmacott CF; Smith MA
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1998 Mar; 52(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 9537303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry reference data for GE Lunar systems.
Fan B; Shepherd JA; Levine MA; Steinberg D; Wacker W; Barden HS; Ergun D; Wu XP
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(3):344-77. PubMed ID: 24161789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Composition analysis of pork carcasses by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Pursel VG; Evock-Clover CM
J Anim Sci; 1998 Aug; 76(8):2104-14. PubMed ID: 9734860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Wu XP; Wacker WK; Ergun DL; Levine MA
J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2208-16. PubMed ID: 22623101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between dual x-ray absorptiometers using pencil beam and fan beam: indicators of bone health and whole-body plus appendicular tissue composition in adult athletes.
Tavares Ó; Duarte JP; Costa DC; Sousa-E-Silva P; Martinho D; Lus LGO; Duarte-Mendes P; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Casanova JM; Cyrino ES; Coelho-E-Silva MJ
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30133612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
