119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10454112)
21. The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes.
Bilsborough JC; Greenway K; Opar D; Livingstone S; Cordy J; Coutts AJ
J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(19):1821-8. PubMed ID: 24914773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Body composition analysis by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in female diabetics differ between manufacturers.
Kistorp CN; Svendsen OL
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jul; 51(7):449-54. PubMed ID: 9234027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: inter-machine variability.
Tataranni PA; Pettitt DJ; Ravussin E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1996 Nov; 20(11):1048-50. PubMed ID: 8923164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dual energy x-ray laser measurement of calcaneal bone mineral density.
Hakulinen MA; Saarakkala S; Töyräs J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1741-52. PubMed ID: 12870580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometers for Assessing Total and Regional Body Composition.
Morrison SA; Petri RM; Hunter HL; Raju D; Gower B
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 26209017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices.
Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Tylavsky F; Cauley J; Dockrell M; Genant HK
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Aug; 89(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 10926643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition.
Laskey MA
Nutrition; 1996 Jan; 12(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 8838836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in piglets.
Chauhan S; Koo WW; Hammami M; Hockman EM
J Am Coll Nutr; 2003 Oct; 22(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 14559933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of bone mineral estimates on percent fat estimates from a four-component model.
Modlesky CM; Evans EM; Millard-Stafford ML; Collins MA; Lewis RD; Cureton KJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Dec; 31(12):1861-8. PubMed ID: 10613441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of a dual energy X-ray absorptiometer: measurement of bone mass and soft tissue composition.
Madsen OR; Jensen JE; Sørensen OH
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1997; 75(6):554-8. PubMed ID: 9202954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement precision of body composition variables using the lunar DPX-L densitometer.
Kiebzak GM; Leamy LJ; Pierson LM; Nord RH; Zhang ZY
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 10745300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial.
Lees B; Garland SW; Walton C; Stevenson JC
Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 9604054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative Comparison of 2 Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Systems in Assessing Body Composition and Bone Mineral Measurements.
Xu W; Chafi H; Guo B; Heymsfield SB; Murray KB; Zheng J; Jia G
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 26206525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Body composition analysis of small pigs by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Conway JM
J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2392-8. PubMed ID: 9781495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.
Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12817754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
