BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10454652)

  • 1. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
    Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I; Campodonico I; Kiriwat O; Holma P; Diaz S; Wan L; Biswas A; Viegas O; el din Abdalla K; Anant MP; Pavez M; Stern J
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study on the efficacy and acceptability of two contraceptive pills administered by the vaginal route: an international multicenter clinical trial.
    Coutinho EM; de Souza JC; da Silva AR; de Acosta OM; Alvarez F; Brache V; Garza Flores J; Vasquez-Estrada L; Santo R; Bassol S
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1993 Jan; 53(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 8422744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives, Minulet and Mercilon, in women over 30 years of age.
    Kirkman RJ; Pedersen JH; Fioretti P; Roberts HE
    Contraception; 1994 Jan; 49(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 8137624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of levonorgestrel implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case-control study.
    Berenson AB; Wiemann CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 172(4 Pt 1):1128-35; discussion 1135-7. PubMed ID: 7726249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
    Peers T; Stevens JE; Graham J; Davey A
    Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hormonal treatment for bleeding irregularities in Norplant implant users.
    Alvarez-Sanchez F; Brache V; Thevenin F; Cochon L; Faundes A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 174(3):919-22. PubMed ID: 8633669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
    Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants, Norplant, on blood coagulation.
    Shaaban MM; Elwan SI; el-Kabsh MY; Farghaly SA; Thabet N
    Contraception; 1984 Nov; 30(5):421-30. PubMed ID: 6440738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
    Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term experience with a low-dose oral contraceptive.
    Brill K; Schnitker J; Albring M
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 1990 Dec; 4(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 2150581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metabolic parameter, bleeding, and weight changes in U.S. women using progestin only contraceptives.
    Mainwaring R; Hales HA; Stevenson K; Hatasaka HH; Poulson AM; Jones KP; Peterson CM
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7621683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.
    Coukell AJ; Balfour JA
    Drugs; 1998 Jun; 55(6):861-87. PubMed ID: 9617600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subdermal contraceptive implants.
    Peralta O; Diaz S; Croxatto H
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 53(1-6):223-6. PubMed ID: 7626459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study on intermittent versus continuous use of a contraceptive pill administered by vaginal route.
    Coutinho EM; O'Dwyer E; Barbosa IC; Gu ZP; Shaaban MM; Aboul-Oyoon M; Abdel Aleem H
    Contraception; 1995 Jun; 51(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 7554976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase III clinical trial with Norplant II (two covered rods): report on five years of use.
    Contraception; 1993 Aug; 48(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 8403909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Norplant contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
    Pasquale SA; Brandeis V; Cruz RI; Kelly S; Sweeney M
    Contraception; 1987 Sep; 36(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 3119287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 74.