These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10454721)

  • 1. A comparison of two commercial quantitative electromyographic algorithms with manual analysis.
    Bromberg MB; Smith AG; Bauerle J
    Muscle Nerve; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1244-8. PubMed ID: 10454721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three algorithms for multi-motor unit detection and waveform marking.
    Brownell AA; Ni O; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2006 Apr; 33(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 16382444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing and standardizing quantitative EMG.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():263-9. PubMed ID: 20715388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MUAP number estimates in surface EMG: template-matching methods and their performance boundaries.
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 32(7):1007-15. PubMed ID: 15298438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skill and selection bias has least influence on motor unit action potential firing rate/frequency.
    Chu J; Takehara I; Li TC; Schwartz I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 43(7):387-92. PubMed ID: 14626717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel method for automated EMG decomposition and MUAP classification.
    Katsis CD; Goletsis Y; Likas A; Fotiadis DI; Sarmas I
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 May; 37(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motor unit action potential (MUAP) parameters affected by editing duration cursors.
    Takehara I; Chu J; Schwartz I; Aye HH
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 15378864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV; Andreassen S
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic decomposition of multichannel intramuscular EMG signals.
    Florestal JR; Mathieu PA; McGill KC
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17513128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative motor unit action potentials (QMUAP) in whiplash patients with neck and upper-limb pain.
    Chu J; Eun SS; Schwartz I
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005; 45(6):323-8. PubMed ID: 16315969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor unit action potential duration, I: variability of manual and automatic measurements.
    Rodríguez I; Gila L; Malanda A; Gurtubay IG; Mallor F; Gómez S; Navallas J; Rodríguez J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 24(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 17277579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing acquisition time in quantitative electromyography.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Sep; 40(3):371-3. PubMed ID: 19618434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of a novel automatic duration method measurement based on the wavelet transform on pathological motor unit action potentials.
    Rodríguez-Carreño I; Gila-Useros L; Malanda-Trigueros A; Gurtubay IG; Navallas-Irujo J; Rodríguez-Falces J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1574-1583. PubMed ID: 20427231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the utility and limitations of counting motor unit action potentials in the surface electromyogram.
    Zhou P; Rymer WZ
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 15876644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of motor unit action potential energy.
    Sheean GL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 123(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 21903464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Computer-assisted analysis of the electromyogram for routine clinical use].
    Strempel JF; Feistner H; Münte TF; Hinrichs H; Heinze HJ
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1992 Sep; 23(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of three quantitative motor unit analysis algorithms.
    McGill KC
    Suppl Clin Neurophysiol; 2009; 60():273-8. PubMed ID: 20715389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of amplitude and area of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988 Jun; 69(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 2453333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part II: Activity, upper centile amplitude, and number of small segments.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
    Muscle Nerve; 1986; 9(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 3736582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simulation study on the relation between the motor unit depth and action potential from multi-channel surface electromyography recordings.
    He J; Luo Z
    J Clin Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 54():146-151. PubMed ID: 29805080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.