These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10455386)

  • 21. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns.
    Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices.
    Sanderink GC; Miles DA
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):249-55, v. PubMed ID: 10740767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital radiography: a survey of pediatric dentists.
    Russo JM; Russo JA; Guelmann M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 17367028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
    Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital radiography: tips for clinical practice.
    Polan M
    Dent Today; 2001 May; 20(5):106-9. PubMed ID: 11443797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge.
    Couture RA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 11803390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.
    Alghazali N; Burnside G; Moallem M; Smith P; Preston A; Jarad FD
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e10-7. PubMed ID: 22561647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Observer performance in detecting multiple radiographic signals. Prediction and analysis using a generalized ROC approach.
    Metz CE; Starr SJ; Lusted LB
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):337-47. PubMed ID: 981610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of noise on the contrast detection threshold in visual perception.
    Sasaki H; Todorokihara M; Ishida T; Miyachi J; Kitamura T; Aoki R
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 16996210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital radiography.
    Rummel JT
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Jan; 136(1):26; author reply 26. PubMed ID: 15693490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography.
    Okamura K; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2020 Oct; 36(4):313-319. PubMed ID: 31302866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cluster signal-to-noise analysis for evaluation of the information content in an image.
    Weerawanich W; Shimizu M; Takeshita Y; Okamura K; Yoshida S; Yoshiura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170147. PubMed ID: 28749736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers.
    Takeshita Y; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Yoshida S; Weerawanich W; Tokumori K; Jasa GR; Yoshiura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160331. PubMed ID: 28045343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.