These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10455387)

  • 1. Cross-sectional presurgical implant imaging using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Liang H; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Lang LA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 10455387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for cross-sectional implant site assessment in the posterior mandible.
    Rashedi B; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Chaffee NR; Guckes AD
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 14508739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned- aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography.
    Liang H; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Lang LA; Nunn ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 11346741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning.
    Aguiar MF; Marques AP; Carvalho AC; Cavalcanti MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 18266874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
    Shelley AM; Brunton P; Horner K
    J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Array geometry for assessment of mandibular implant position using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Limrachtamorn S; Edge MJ; Gettleman L; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15140819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width.
    Dantas JA; Montebello Filho A; Campos PS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15709099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-sectional imaging of the jaws for dental implant treatment: accuracy of linear tomography using a panoramic machine in comparison with reformatted computed tomography.
    Naitoh M; Kawamata A; Iida H; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 11858566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Morant RD; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 11174606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-office linear tomography: a new technology for definitive preplanning of endosteal implant sites.
    Zosky JG
    Int J Dent Symp; 1995; 3(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9117863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of over- and underexposure on the sharpness of the image of a marker in computer-assisted dental implant tomography.
    Thunthy KH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12087446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practical incorporation of computed tomography into daily implant treatment planning.
    Caldwell CS
    Tex Dent J; 2005 Apr; 122(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 15984368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnosis of external root resorption using TACT (tuned-aperture computed tomography).
    Nance RS; Tyndall D; Levin LG; Trope M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 2000 Feb; 16(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 11202852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone in the mandible.
    Lindh C; Nilsson M; Klinge B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 9084263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery.
    Jacobs R; Adriansens A; Verstreken K; Suetens P; van Steenberghe D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10522199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
    Hanssens JF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) in the localization of simulated periodontal defects.
    Ramesh A; Ludlow JB; Webber RL; Tyndall DA; Paquette D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 11641730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.