118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10456518)
1. Radiotransparency of the triglyceride mammary prosthesis: a quantitative analysis with mastectomy specimens.
García-Tutor E; Hontanilla B; Agreda J; Bazán A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Sep; 104(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 10456518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiotransparency of polyvinylpyrrolidone-hydrogel and hydrogel breast implants: a quantitative analysis with mastectomy specimens.
Garcia-Tutor E; Alonso-Burgos A; Marre D; Adrian CA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 20953958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty.
Dershaw DD; Chaglassian TA
Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):69-74. PubMed ID: 2909122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspiciouis microcalcifications.
Aref A; Youssef E; Washington T; Segel M; Grigorian C; Bongers S; Bouwman D
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10696735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography as a screening tool for peripheral vascular disease.
Dale PS; Graham J; Nichols KW; Catchings T; Richards M
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):488-91. PubMed ID: 16978956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic visualization of a nonpalpable breast mass through a radiolucent breast implant.
Santi P; Leone MS; Passarelli B; Cicchetti S; Imperiale A; Young VL; Knapp TR
Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Oct; 39(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 9339273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digitization of microcalcifications in breast radiographs. Correlation with pathologic data.
Charpin C; Allasia C; Davies JD; Devictor B; Boulat J; Ansaldi JL; Lavaut MN; Serradour B; Andrac L; Piana L
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 8526947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography].
Charpin C; Garcia S
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications.
de Paredes ES; Abbitt PL; Tabbarah S; Bickers MA; Smith DC
Radiographics; 1990 Jul; 10(4):577-89. PubMed ID: 2377764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical, radiographic, and pathologic features of medical calcific sclerosis in the breast.
Kragel PJ; Aquino MO; Fiorella R; Chapman J
South Med J; 1997 May; 90(5):518-21. PubMed ID: 9160071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microcalcification and its relationship to cancer of the breast: experience in a screening clinic.
Muir BB; Lamb J; Anderson TJ; Kirkpatrick AE
Clin Radiol; 1983 Mar; 34(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 6825401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changing patterns of microcalcification on screening mammography for prediction of breast cancer.
Kim KI; Lee KH; Kim TR; Chun YS; Lee TH; Choi HY; Park HK
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 25651818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy: diagnosis with mammography and US.
Rissanen TJ; Mäkäräinen HP; Mattila SI; Lindholm EL; Heikkinen MI; Kiviniemi HO
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):463-7. PubMed ID: 8327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms.
Monostori Z; Herman PG; Carmody DP; Eacobacci TM; Capece NR; Cruz VM; Gentin S; Vernace FM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 1948599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Lobular cancer transformation of the female breast. Mammography diagnosis and clinical relevance].
Bochmann D; Bahnsen J; Löning T; Böcker W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Apr; 56(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 8682286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Independent evaluation of computer classification of malignant and benign calcifications in full-field digital mammograms.
Rana RS; Jiang Y; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Liu B
Acad Radiol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 17307670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening mammography interpretation test: more frequent mistakes.
Gozzi G; Martinoli C; Conti GM; Ganzetti A; Bodini M; Fiorentino C; Marini UP; Santini D; Bacigalupo L
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 15775896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens.
Liberman L; Evans WP; Dershaw DD; Hann LE; Deutch BM; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):223-5. PubMed ID: 8259409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
