These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10456600)

  • 1. Evaluation of orthodontists' perception of treatment need and the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
    McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Keeling SD; Yurkiewicz L; Taylor MG; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 10456600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with orthodontists' assessment of difficulty.
    Cassinelli AG; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 12750666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of treatment needs for maxillary protrusion: comparison of dental students, residents, and orthodontists.
    Kuroda S; Fuji A; Sugie M; Uoi S; Kondo R; Ando R; Yamashiro T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 20197170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of orthodontic treatment need by professionals and parents with different socio-demographic characteristics.
    Doğan AA; Sari E; Uskun E; Sağlam AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):672-6. PubMed ID: 20299423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.
    Dyken RA; Sadowsky PL; Hurst D
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11407767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.
    DeGuzman L; Bahiraei D; Vig KW; Vig PS; Weyant RJ; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 7847276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.
    King GJ; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C; Taylor M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusal indexes as judged by subjective opinions.
    Arruda AO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):671-5. PubMed ID: 18984400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Onyeaso CO; Begole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 17276867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need.
    Firestone AR; Beck FM; Beglin FM; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 12439473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are the Peer Assessment Rating Index and the Index of Treatment Complexity, Outcome, and Need suitable measures for orthognathic outcomes?
    Templeton KM; Powell R; Moore MB; Williams AC; Sandy JR
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Oct; 28(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 16648208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Orthodontic treatment needs and indications assessed with IONT].
    Grzywacz I
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 16871750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An index of orthodontic treatment complexity.
    Llewellyn SK; Hamdan AM; Rock WP
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 17229790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes.
    Ormiston JP; Huang GJ; Little RM; Decker JD; Seuk GD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):568-74; quiz 669. PubMed ID: 16286203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
    Mayers M; Firestone AR; Rashid R; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 16214623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parents' satisfaction with their child's orthodontic care: a comparison of orthodontists and pediatric dentists.
    Mascarenhas AK; Vig K; Joo BH
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 16532884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
    Holman JK; Hans MG; Nelson S; Powers MP
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 9851350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.