These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10456603)

  • 1. Very early face mask therapy in Class III children.
    Deguchi T; Kanomi R; Ashizawa Y; Rosenstein SW
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 10456603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early treatment of skeletal Class III: a case report.
    Maheshwari S; Gupta ND
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):148-51. PubMed ID: 12396092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 11029736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability of changes associated with chin cup treatment.
    Deguchi T; Kitsugi A
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 8712492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients.
    Arman A; Ufuk Toygar T; Abuhijleh E
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 16731542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a magnetic appliance in functional Class III patients.
    Tuncer C; Uner O
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 16279823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of successful chincup therapy in skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Ko YI; Baek SH; Mah J; Yang WS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 15224056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
    Yoshida I; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion.
    Rey D; Angel D; Oberti G; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face mask therapy effects in two skeletal maturation groups of female subjects with skeletal Class III malocclusions.
    Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):842-8. PubMed ID: 19705942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases.
    Isci D; Turk T; Elekdag-Turk S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):706-15. PubMed ID: 20457582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentofacial changes in patients with Class III malocclusions treated by a combination of activator and chin-cup appliances.
    Basdra EK; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Mar; 14(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 9528405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.