133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10456634)
1. Relationship between atrioventricular delay and oxygen consumption in patients with sick sinus syndrome: relevance to rate responsive pacing.
Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 22(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 10456634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the pacing rate on the atrioventricular conduction time during aerobic and anaerobic exercise: basic concepts for a dromotropically controlled rate responsive pacemaker.
Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Mügge A; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1782-91. PubMed ID: 10642132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Control algorithm for the "dromotropic" cardiac pacemaker concept].
Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():350-1. PubMed ID: 9859393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Hatano K; Kato R; Hayashi H; Noda S; Sotobata I; Murase M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the chronotropic response at the anaerobic threshold: an objective measure of chronotropic function.
Meine M; Achtelik M; Hexamer M; Kloppe A; Werner J; Trappe HJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Oct; 23(10 Pt 1):1457-67. PubMed ID: 11060865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block.
Mayumi H; Kohno H; Yasui H; Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Correlations of heart rate and AV time to degree of performance: significance for the dromotropic pacemaker concept].
Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Lemke B; Barmeyer J
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():271-2. PubMed ID: 9517147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A new principle of rate adaptive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Irnich W; Conrady J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1823-8. PubMed ID: 2463553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits of rate-responsive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Nishino M; Ito T; Miyawaki M; Nakagawa T; Kuryu T; Tanahashi H; Yamada Y; Abe H
Angiology; 1994 May; 45(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8172382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atrial pacing for sick sinus syndrome.
Rosenqvist M
Clin Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2404646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A technical regulating approach to dromotropic control of closed-loop frequency adjustment].
Molina A; Urbaszek A; Schaldach M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():352-3. PubMed ID: 9859394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise test of DDDR versus DDD pacing.
Capucci A; Boriani G; Specchia S; Marinelli M; Santarelli A; Magnani B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1908-13. PubMed ID: 1279570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of a rate responsive pacemaker in sick sinus syndrome].
Ito T; Nishino M; Nakagawa T; Okada T; Hasegawa S; Kuryu T; Ebisuno S; Ohnishi S; Tanahashi H; Yasuno M
Kokyu To Junkan; 1993 Jan; 41(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8434162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AV conduction with atrial rate adaptive pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome.
Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Pistorius C; Schwerdt H; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1502-9. PubMed ID: 10588153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate adaptive atrial pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome.
Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Schwerdt H; Lindenberger I; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12):2571-9. PubMed ID: 9894647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate-responsive pacing using the atrio-ventricular conduction time: design and test of a new algorithm.
Hexamer M; Drewes C; Meine M; Kloppe A; Weckmüller J; Mügge A; Werner J
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Sep; 42(5):688-97. PubMed ID: 15503971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
