These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10457547)

  • 1. The "mad" vs. the "bad" revisited: managing predatory behavior.
    Tucker W
    Psychiatr Q; 1999; 70(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 10457547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kansas v. Hendricks.
    Grudzinskas AJ; Henry MG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 9460048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. After Hendricks: defining constitutional treatment for Washington State's Civil commitment program.
    Lieb R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():474-88. PubMed ID: 12839920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychopathy as a risk factor for violence.
    Hare RD
    Psychiatr Q; 1999; 70(3):181-97. PubMed ID: 10457544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual aggression: mad, bad, and mad.
    Schopp RF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():324-36; discussion 352-9. PubMed ID: 12839908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A population at risk: civil commitment of substance abusers after Kansas v. Hendricks.
    Krongard ML
    Calif Law Rev; 2002 Jan; 90(1):111-63. PubMed ID: 16506331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future of involuntary civil commitment in the U.S.A. after Kansas v. Hendricks.
    La Fond JQ
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(2-3):153-67. PubMed ID: 10874286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The increasingly blurred line between "mad" and "bad": treating personality disorders in the prison setting.
    Hall DL; Miraglia RP; Lee LW
    Albany Law Rev; 2011; 74(3):1277-300. PubMed ID: 22003592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: a case law survey.
    DeMatteo D; Edens JF; Galloway M; Cox J; Smith ST; Formon D
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24127888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kansas v. Hendricks: is it time to lock the door and throw away the key for sexually violent predators?
    Kolebuck MD
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 14(2):537-62. PubMed ID: 9693491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual predator commitment laws: lessons for law and the behavioral sciences.
    Janus ES
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 10736574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The civil commitment of sex offenders.
    Zonana H
    Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1248-9. PubMed ID: 9411753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
    Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend".
    Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The aggressive patient/inmate: beyond denial.
    Maier GJ
    Psychiatr Q; 1999; 70(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 10457545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexually violent predators and civil commitment laws.
    Kendall WD; Cheung M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2004; 13(2):41-57. PubMed ID: 15388411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting recidivism with the Personality Assessment Inventory in a sample of sex offenders screened for civil commitment as sexually violent predators.
    Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Hawes SW; Simpler A; Johnson J
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 20230160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From Hendricks to Crane: the sexually violent predator trilogy and the inchoate jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 12875504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bad or mad? Thinking in terms of 'bad or mad' and the (possible) prosecution of offenses committed by the mentally ill].
    Visscher AJ; van de Kraats GB; van der Goot B; Braam AW
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2015; 57(7):480-8. PubMed ID: 26189416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seling v. Young: constitutionally protected but unjust civil commitment for sexually violent predators.
    Connor JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 18(2):511-41. PubMed ID: 12173446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.