These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10457687)

  • 21. Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best?
    Woods J; Woods CA; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 19675462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses in presbyopia treatment.
    Barisić A; Dekaris I; Gabrić N; Bohac M; Romac I; Mravicić I; Lazić R
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Oct; 32 Suppl 2():27-31. PubMed ID: 19138002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prescribing for the moderate-to-advanced ametropic presbyopic VDT user. A comparison of the Technica Progressive and Datalite CRT trifocal.
    Butzon SP; Eagels SR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Aug; 68(8):495-502. PubMed ID: 9279049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Presbyopic Personal Computer Work: A Comparison of Progressive Addition Lenses for General Purpose and Personal Computer Work.
    Kolbe O; Degle S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Nov; 95(11):1046-1053. PubMed ID: 30339644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants.
    Pepose JS; Qazi MA; Davies J; Doane JF; Loden JC; Sivalingham V; Mahmoud AM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 144(3):347-357. PubMed ID: 17651679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Glare and halo with refractive correction.
    Allen RJ; Saleh GM; Litwin AS; Sciscio A; Beckingsale AB; Fitzke FW
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Mar; 91(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 18350646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of bifocal and progressive addition lenses on aviator target detection performance.
    Markovits AS; Reddix MD; O'Connell SR; Collyer PD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Apr; 66(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7794220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses.
    Callina T; Reynolds TP
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 19(1):25-33, v. PubMed ID: 16500526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.
    Martin R; de Juan V; Rodriguez G; Martin S; Fonseca S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Compensating presbyopia: a new physiological progressive lens (author's transl)].
    Manent PJ; Pecheur J; Maille M; Claude R
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1981; 4(11):757-61. PubMed ID: 7328271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses.
    Efron S; Efron N; Morgan PB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical comparison of the TruVision Omni and four progressive addition lenses.
    Wittenberg S; Richmond PN; Cohen-Setton J; Winter RR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 2703652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contact lenses in pediatrics study in Singapore.
    Li L; Moody K; Tan DT; Yew KC; Ming PY; Long QB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 19516144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptability of a broad spectrum of randomly selected patients to a variable design progressive lens: report of a nationwide clinical trial.
    Young JM; Borish IM
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Jun; 65(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 8089391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The VEPRO trial: a cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia.
    Boutron I; Touizer C; Pitrou I; Roy C; Ravaud P
    Trials; 2008 Sep; 9():54. PubMed ID: 18803826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison of visual results and quality of vision between two multifocal intraocular lenses. Multifocal silicone and bifocal PMMA].
    Lesueur L; Gajan B; Nardin M; Chapotot E; Arne JL
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2000 Apr; 23(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 10794984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of synergeyes versus traditional rigid gas permeable lens designs for patients with irregular corneas.
    Nau AC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 18787425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Combined implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction in cataract patients].
    Mayer S; Böhm T; Häberle H; Pham DT; Wirbelauer C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Sep; 225(9):812-7. PubMed ID: 18759213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.