These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10458498)

  • 21. Informed consent for screening.
    Carter L; Bowman D; Oakeshott P
    Fam Pract; 2003 Apr; 20(2):222. PubMed ID: 12651800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control. For how long should we rescreen?
    Farrell DJ; Bilkhu S; Gibson LM; Cummings L; Wadehra V
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 9100751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
    Herbert A
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prostate cancer screening at National Cancer Institute comprehensive and clinical cancer centers.
    Taylor KL; Africano NL; Schwartz M; Cullen J; Ahaghotu C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Mar; 96(5):414-5. PubMed ID: 14996868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method.
    Cross PA
    Cytopathology; 1997 Apr; 8(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 9134332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective study of PAPNET: review of 25,656 Pap smears negative on manual screening and rapid rescreening.
    Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
    Cytopathology; 1999 Oct; 10(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 10588350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A look at Pap test accuracy and the duty to inform from a risk management perspective.
    Meister S
    QRC Advis; 1997 Dec; 14(2):1, 5-8. PubMed ID: 10176015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Role of re-screening of cervical smears in internal quality control.
    Baker A; Melcher D; Smith R
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 48(11):1002-4. PubMed ID: 8543619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Internal quality assurance in cervical cytology one laboratory's experience.
    Cross PA
    Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8833871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA '88) on the incidence of invasive cervical cancer.
    Helfand M; O'Connor GT; Zimmer-Gembeck M; Beck JR
    Med Care; 1992 Dec; 30(12):1067-82. PubMed ID: 1453813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 17017433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changing terminology and screening recommendations in cervical cytology screening programs.
    Robertson DI; Srivannaboon S; Pairwuti S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Jan; 75 Suppl 1():90-3. PubMed ID: 1402489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of genital infection on cervical cytology.
    Brady M; Brook G
    Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Dec; 74(6):457-8. PubMed ID: 10195065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Making the most of Pap tests.
    Barratt A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Nov; 55(11):774-5. PubMed ID: 11604430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unsatisfactory cervical cytology screening specimens are associated with missed cervical dysplasia and cancer.
    Nance KV
    BJOG; 2009 May; 116(6):866-7; author reply 867. PubMed ID: 19445012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears.
    Giles JA; Deery A; Crow J; Walker P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1067-70. PubMed ID: 2804009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New technologies in cervical cytology screening: a word of caution.
    Sawaya GF; Grimes DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 94(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 10432148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 100% rapid (partial) rescreening for quality assurance.
    Lemay C; Meisels A
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 9987456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
    Payne L; Lavis P
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.