These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10458528)

  • 1. Accuracy of strategies for monitoring fetal heart rate in labor.
    Simpson N; Oppenheimer LW; Siren A; Bland E; McDonald O; McDonald D; Dabrowski A
    Am J Perinatol; 1999; 16(4):167-73. PubMed ID: 10458528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in labor.
    Pello LC; Rosevear SK; Dawes GS; Moulden M; Redman CW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 78(4):602-10. PubMed ID: 1923162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal heart rate pattern recognition by the method of auscultation.
    Miller FC; Pearse KE; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 6462562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability using the matching pursuit technique as an indicator of fetal hypoxia during labor.
    Salamalekis E; Hintipas E; Salloum I; Vasios G; Loghis C; Vitoratos N; Chrelias Ch; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Mar; 19(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 16690510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in labor: detection of intervals with un-assignable baseline.
    Georgieva A; Payne SJ; Moulden M; Redman CW
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1549-60. PubMed ID: 21862845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new computerized analysis to precisely evaluate heart rate variability during the nonstress test.
    Kobayashi H; Yoshida A; Kobayashi M; Hamada T; Noguchi Y; Yamada T
    Am J Perinatol; 2003 Feb; 20(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 12660912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
    Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Physical diagnostics--auscultation of fetal heart sounds].
    Nijhuis JG; van den Berg PP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Feb; 143(9):455-8. PubMed ID: 10221122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Goodlin RC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):643; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 7898852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Bader TJ; Morgan MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):643; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 7898851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
    Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians?
    Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo GF; Bogani G; Casarin J; Agosti M; Ghezzi F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 35(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 25254299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor.
    Pinto P; Bernardes J; Costa-Santos C; Amorim-Costa C; Silva M; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jun; 49():30-5. PubMed ID: 24727565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The medico-legal value of monitoring of the fetal heart rate during labor].
    Cynober E; Jeny R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(6):561-6; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 9453971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Fetal phonocardiography with a novel approach].
    Várady P; Wildt L
    Orv Hetil; 2001 Sep; 142(36):1971-6. PubMed ID: 11680102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring and tocodynamometry in routine obstetrical care, fetal stress and non-stress testing, and labor induction in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).
    Mahoney CJ; Gordon M; Briggs D
    J Med Primatol; 1990; 19(8):681-714. PubMed ID: 2084260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deceleration area of fetal heart rate trace and fetal acidemia at delivery: a case-control study.
    Giannubilo SR; Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Palla GP; Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Feb; 20(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 17437212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Pre-partum cardiotocography: comparison between the traditional and the computed systems].
    Soncini E; Grignaffini A; Vadora E
    Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 2000; 71 Suppl 1():337-43. PubMed ID: 11424766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.
    Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.