These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10458528)

  • 21. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain.
    Romano M; Bracale M; Cesarelli M; Campanile M; Bifulco P; De Falco M; Sansone M; Di Lieto A
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 16005863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Preliminary evaluation of the usefulness of the "CAMAC" system in analyzing the cardiotocogram during labor].
    Niespodziański K; Plutecki J; Starzewski J; Niziurski P; Miecznikowski A
    Przegl Lek; 1988; 45(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 3227118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developments in CTG analysis.
    Van Geijn HP
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jun; 10(2):185-209. PubMed ID: 8836480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
    Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fetal heart rate in the second stage of labor: recording, reading, interpreting and acting.
    Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2551-4. PubMed ID: 22877246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and congenital fetal hypothyroidism.
    Rozen A; Sheiner E
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(6):267-9. PubMed ID: 17566569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation.
    Parer JT; Hamilton EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 203(5):451.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20633869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toward quantitative fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Cao H; Lake DE; Ferguson JE; Chisholm CA; Griffin MP; Moorman JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jan; 53(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 16402610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings.
    Salamalekis E; Siristatidis C; Vasios G; Saloum J; Giannaris D; Chrelias C; Prentza A; Koutsouris D
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Apr; 32(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 16594915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differences between external and internal fetal heart rate monitoring during the second stage of labor: a prospective observational study.
    Nunes I; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Jul; 42(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 24445232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Errors and pitfalls in reading the cardiotocographic tracing.
    Di Tommaso M; Seravalli V; Petraglia F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Apr; 71(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 30318881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extraction of fetal heart-rate signal as the time event series from evenly sampled data acquired using Doppler ultrasound technique.
    Jezewski J; Kupka T; Horoba K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):805-10. PubMed ID: 18270022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Feb; 39(2):106-18. PubMed ID: 19193367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Fetal heart rate during labour: definitions and interpretation].
    Martin A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S34-45. PubMed ID: 18191915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality of intrapartum cardiotocography in twin deliveries.
    Bakker PC; Colenbrander GJ; Verstraeten AA; Van Geijn HP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2114-9. PubMed ID: 15592300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Fetal behavior in multiple pregnancy: methodologic, clinical and scientific aspects].
    Arabin B; von Eyck J; Wisser J; Versmold H; Weitzel HK
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Nov; 51(11):869-75. PubMed ID: 1773920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occurrence of ST-changes recorded with the STAN S21-monitor during normal and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns during labour.
    Kwee A; Dekkers AH; van Wijk HP; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Visser GH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 17134817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
    Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.