These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10458528)

  • 41. Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring during late gestation in cattle by means of Doppler ultrasonography: reference values obtained by computer-assisted analysis.
    Breukelman S; Mulder EJ; van Oord R; Jonker H; van der Weijden BC; Taverne MA
    Theriogenology; 2006 Feb; 65(3):486-98. PubMed ID: 16095680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography.
    Galazios G; Tripsianis G; Tsikouras P; Koutlaki N; Liberis V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Feb; 281(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 19455348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fetal monitoring during labor.
    Ingemarsson I
    Neonatology; 2009; 95(4):342-6. PubMed ID: 19494555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparative study of a new cardiotocography analysis program.
    Chen CY; Chen JC; Yu C; Lin CW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2567-70. PubMed ID: 19965213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Observations on perinatal heart rate monitoring. II. Quantitative unreliability of Doppler fetal heart rate variability.
    Suidan JS; Young BK; Hochberg HM; George ME
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Jul; 30(7):519-22. PubMed ID: 4032387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of labor analgesia with nalbuphine hydrochloride on fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Poehlmann S; Pinette M; Stubblefield P
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Oct; 40(10):707-10. PubMed ID: 8551472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 3rd edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2018 Dec; 22(6):e1-e32. PubMed ID: 30501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fetal heart rate cyclicity during preterm labor.
    Petrikovsky BM; Vintzileos AM; Lerer T
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Feb; 35(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 2304038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The influence of observer-dependent properties upon the evaluation of fetal heart rate recordings (author's transl)].
    Richter R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Jan; 41(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 7202992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Computerized FHR traces in post-term pregnancies.
    Piazze JJ; Cerekja A; Buccheri M; Martiello S; Anceschi MM
    J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(2):182-3. PubMed ID: 18257655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Surveillance of growth-retarded fetuses with computerized fetal heart rate monitoring combined with Doppler velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries.
    Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Schulman H; Lopresti S; Schneider E
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Feb; 41(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 8656410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Feature selection using genetic algorithms for fetal heart rate analysis.
    Xu L; Redman CW; Payne SJ; Georgieva A
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1357-71. PubMed ID: 24854596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Identification of the dynamic relationship between intrapartum uterine pressure and fetal heart rate for normal and hypoxic fetuses.
    Warrick PA; Hamilton EF; Precup D; Kearney RE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1587-97. PubMed ID: 19237336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring during labour: A systematic scoping review to identify methods, effects, and accuracy.
    Blix E; Maude R; Hals E; Kisa S; Karlsen E; Nohr EA; de Jonge A; Lindgren H; Downe S; Reinar LM; Foureur M; Pay ASD; Kaasen A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219573. PubMed ID: 31291375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
    Giannina G; Guzman ER; Lai YL; Lake MF; Cernadas M; Vintzileos AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 7651658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns.
    Parer JT; Ikeda T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 197(1):26.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17618744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Doppler Ultrasound Technology for Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: A Review.
    Hamelmann P; Vullings R; Kolen AF; Bergmans JWM; van Laar JOEH; Tortoli P; Mischi M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):226-238. PubMed ID: 31562079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improvements in fetal heart rate analysis by the removal of maternal-fetal heart rate ambiguities.
    Pinto P; Costa-Santos C; Gonçalves H; Ayres-De-Campos D; Bernardes J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Nov; 15():301. PubMed ID: 26585345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variability signal during the stages of labor.
    Annunziata ML; Tagliaferri S; Esposito FG; Giuliano N; Mereghini F; Di Lieto A; Campanile M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Mar; 42(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 26787219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.