These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10458879)

  • 1. Coal tits, Parus ater, lose weight in response to chases by predators.
    Carrascal LM; Polo V
    Anim Behav; 1999 Aug; 58(2):281-285. PubMed ID: 10458879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of latitude and day length on fattening strategies of wintering coal tits Periparus ater (L.): a field study and aviary experiment.
    Polo V; Carrascal LM; Metcalfe NB
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Sep; 76(5):866-72. PubMed ID: 17714264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To eat and not be eaten: diurnal mass gain and foraging strategies in wintering great tits.
    Moiron M; Mathot KJ; Dingemanse NJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Mar; 285(1874):. PubMed ID: 29540518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does diurnal variation in body mass affect take-off ability in wintering willow tits?
    Kullberg C
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jul; 56(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 9710481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Yellowhammers get fatter in the presence of a predator.
    Lilliendahl K
    Anim Behav; 1998 May; 55(5):1335-40. PubMed ID: 9632516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do great tits (Parus major) suppress basal metabolic rate in response to increased perceived predation danger? A field experiment.
    Mathot KJ; Abbey-Lee RN; Kempenaers B; Dingemanse NJ
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 164(Pt A):400-6. PubMed ID: 27342428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separating the effects of predation risk and interrupted foraging upon mass changes in the blue tit Parus caeruleus.
    Rands SA; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 268(1478):1783-90. PubMed ID: 11522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term declines in winter body mass of tits throughout Britain and Ireland correlate with climate change.
    Furness EN; Robinson RA
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Feb; 9(3):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 30805153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fat reserves and perceived predation risk in the great tit, Parus major.
    Gentle LK; Gosler AG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):487-91. PubMed ID: 11296860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioural and physiological responses of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) to experimental manipulations of predation and starvation risk.
    Monarca RI; Mathias Mda L; Speakman JR
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():331-9. PubMed ID: 26143188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of food availability and distance to protective cover on the winter foraging behaviour of tits (Aves: Parus).
    Walther B; Gosler A
    Oecologia; 2001 Oct; 129(2):312-320. PubMed ID: 28547610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of fat reserves in tufted titmice Baelophus bicolor in relation to risk of predation.
    Pravosudov VV; Grubb TC
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jul; 56(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 9710461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of enlarged body size of coal tits Parus ater in geographic isolation from two larger competitors, the crested tit Parus cristatus and the willow tit Parus montanus, on six Scandinavian islands.
    Norberg RÅ; Lindhe Norberg UM
    Biol Open; 2015 Oct; 4(11):1490-508. PubMed ID: 26490673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Object permanence in the food-storing coal tit (Periparus ater) and the non-storing great tit (Parus major): Is the mental representation required?
    Marhounová L; Frynta D; Fuchs R; Landová E
    J Comp Psychol; 2017 May; 131(2):115-127. PubMed ID: 28263620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.
    Klecka J; Boukal DS
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 23869526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.
    Milligan ND; Radersma R; Cole EF; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silence is not golden: the hissing calls of tits affect the behaviour of a nest predator.
    Zub K; Czeszczewik D; Ruczyński I; Kapusta A; Walankiewicz W
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017; 71(5):79. PubMed ID: 28435180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sight of a predator can stimulate a corticosterone response in the great tit (Parus major).
    Cockrem JF; Silverin B
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2002 Feb; 125(2):248-55. PubMed ID: 11884070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How climate change might influence the starvation-predation risk trade-off response.
    Cresswell W; Clark JA; Macleod R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Oct; 276(1672):3553-60. PubMed ID: 19625317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predator-specific effects on incubation behaviour and offspring growth in great tits.
    Basso A; Richner H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121088. PubMed ID: 25830223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.