BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 104597)

  • 1. Prospective comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography in the evaluation of gynecologic pelvic masses.
    Walsh JW; Rosenfield AT; Jaffe CC; Schwartz PE; Simeone J; Dembner AG; Taylor KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):955-60. PubMed ID: 104597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical significance of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of intrapelvic masses (author's transl)].
    Kuroda T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1979 Aug; 39(8):821-39. PubMed ID: 503803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controversies in the radiologic diagnosis of pelvic malignancies.
    Choyke PL; Thickman D; Kressel HY; Lynch JH; Jaffe MH; Clark LR; Zeman RK
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Sep; 23(3):531-49. PubMed ID: 3903844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance features of gynecologic abnormalities in women presenting with acute or chronic abdominal pain.
    Kalish GM; Patel MD; Gunn ML; Dubinsky TJ
    Ultrasound Q; 2007 Sep; 23(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 17805165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Diagnosis of gynecologic pelvic masses by CT scan (author's transl)].
    Ito H; Kubo A; Takagi Y; Kinoshita H; Maekawa A; Okada K; Kamiyama I; Takeuchi H
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1981 May; 26(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 7277761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective study of computed tomography and ultrasound in the detection and staging of pelvic masses.
    Sanders RC; McNeil BJ; Finberg HJ; Hessel SJ; Siegelman SS; Adams DF; Alderson PO; Abrams HL
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):439-42. PubMed ID: 6849090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic value of pelvic examination, ultrasound, and serum CA 125 in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass. An international multicenter study.
    Schutter EM; Kenemans P; Sohn C; Kristen P; Crombach G; Westermann R; Môbus V; Kaufmann M; Caffier H; Schmidt-Rhode P
    Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1398-406. PubMed ID: 8055463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in gynecologic imaging and intervention.
    Binkovitz LA; King BF; Corfman RS
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1991 Nov; 66(11):1133-51. PubMed ID: 1943247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of pelvic pathology.
    Balan P
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 58(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 16289430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Recurrences of pelvic cancers. Imaging and evaluation of the loco-regional extension].
    Janser JC; Moyses B; Rodier JF
    Ann Chir; 1999; 53(9):898-900. PubMed ID: 10633938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-sectional imaging of the pelvic tumors and tumor-like lesions in gynecologic patients-misinterpretation points and differential diagnosis.
    Padovan RS; Kralik M; Prutki M; Hrabak M; Oberman B; Potocki K
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18603185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound diagnosis of gynecologic pelvic masses.
    Cochrane WJ; Thomas MA
    Radiology; 1974 Mar; 110(3):649-54. PubMed ID: 4811686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis with ovarian and parametrial involvement.
    Robles-Frías A; Severín CE; Robles-Frías MJ; Garrido JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 2):834-5. PubMed ID: 11336772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of gynecologic pelvic masses by ultrasound and computed tomography.
    Sommer FG; Walsh JW; Schwartz PE; Viscomi GN; Jaffe CC; Taylor KJ; Rosenfield AT
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Jan; 27(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7097660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recurrent female pelvic cancer: assessment with transrectal ultrasonography.
    Meanwell CA; Rolfe EB; Blackledge G; Docker MF; Lawton FG; Mould JJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):278-81. PubMed ID: 3538149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound in gynecology.
    Cochrane WJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1975 Dec; 13(3):457-66. PubMed ID: 1202573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging of questionable and unusual pelvic masses.
    Reuter KL; D'Orsi CJ; Raptopoulos V; Evers K
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Aug; 59(704):765-71. PubMed ID: 3524736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gray-scale ultrasound in 204 proved gynecologic masses: accuracy and specific diagnostic criteria.
    Walsh JW; Taylor KJ; Wasson JF; Schwartz PE; Rosenfield AT
    Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 760155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis.
    Bryan PJ; Butler HE; LiPuma JP
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1984 Dec; 22(4):897-915. PubMed ID: 6083581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomography of gynecologic diseases.
    Gross BH; Moss AA; Mihara K; Goldberg HI; Glazer GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Oct; 141(4):765-73. PubMed ID: 6351568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.