These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a Mexican PD center. Sanchez AR; Madonia C; Rascon-Pacheco RA Kidney Int Suppl; 2008 Apr; (108):S76-80. PubMed ID: 18379553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison between continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal. Virga G; La Milia V; Cancarini G; Sandrini M J Nephrol; 2013; 26 Suppl 21():140-58. PubMed ID: 24307444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Taking peritoneal dialysis beyond the year 2000. Gokal R Perit Dial Int; 1999; 19 Suppl 3():S35-42; discussion S43. PubMed ID: 10433550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The future of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (pros). Di Paolo N Contrib Nephrol; 1982; (34):78-84. PubMed ID: 7172682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The era of standardized prescription management for peritoneal dialysis must end. Hull AR Perit Dial Int; 1996; 16(5):434-6. PubMed ID: 8914170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Standard methods of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and standard peritoneal dialysis solutions in the future in Japan]. Nakamoto H Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi; 2009; 51(7):864-74. PubMed ID: 19928560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]