457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10460124)
1. A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait.
van der Linden ML; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Li N; Paul JP
J Biomech; 1999 Sep; 32(9):877-89. PubMed ID: 10460124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot.
Schneider K; Hart T; Zernicke RF; Setoguchi Y; Oppenheim W
J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1191-204. PubMed ID: 8253824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of prosthetic ankle stiffness on ankle and knee kinematics, prosthetic limb loading, and net metabolic cost of trans-tibial amputee gait.
Major MJ; Twiste M; Kenney LP; Howard D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 24238976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees. A comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet.
Colborne GR; Naumann S; Longmuir PE; Berbrayer D
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Oct; 71(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 1388973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot.
Heitzmann DWW; Salami F; De Asha AR; Block J; Putz C; Wolf SI; Alimusaj M
Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():174-180. PubMed ID: 29913354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation.
Segal AD; Zelik KE; Klute GK; Morgenroth DC; Hahn ME; Orendurff MS; Adamczyk PG; Collins SH; Kuo AD; Czerniecki JM
Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):918-31. PubMed ID: 22100728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations.
Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
Struchkov V; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sound side joint contact forces in below knee amputee gait with an ESAR prosthetic foot.
Karimi MT; Salami F; Esrafilian A; Heitzmann DWW; Alimusaj M; Putz C; Wolf SI
Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():246-251. PubMed ID: 28822943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional joint center of prosthetic feet during level ground and incline walking.
Lecomte C; Starker F; Guðnadóttir EÞ; Rafnsdóttir S; Guðmundsson K; Briem K; Brynjolfsson S
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jul; 81():13-21. PubMed ID: 32527519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lower-limb amputee ankle and hip kinetic response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement.
Segal AD; Shofer JB; Klute GK
J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(15):3982-3988. PubMed ID: 26475221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of prosthetic ankle units on the gait of persons with bilateral trans-femoral amputations.
McNealy LL; Gard SA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Mar; 32(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 18330810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
Turcot K; Sagawa Y; Lacraz A; Lenoir J; Assal M; Armand S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy flow analysis of amputee walking shows a proximally-directed transfer of energy in intact limbs, compared to a distally-directed transfer in prosthetic limbs at push-off.
Weinert-Aplin RA; Howard D; Twiste M; Jarvis HL; Bennett AN; Baker RJ
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Jan; 39():73-82. PubMed ID: 27836575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of limb alignment on the gait of above-knee amputees.
Yang L; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Paul JP
J Biomech; 1991; 24(11):981-97. PubMed ID: 1761584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact on the biomechanics of overground gait of using an 'Echelon' hydraulic ankle-foot device in unilateral trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees.
De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Aug; 29(7):728-34. PubMed ID: 24997811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of transtibial amputee and non-amputee biomechanics during a common turning task.
Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Schoen J; Klute GK
Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20974535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
