These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP. Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Griffin N; Wastle ML; Dunn WK; Ryder SD; Beckingham IJ Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?]. Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis. Guarise A; Baltieri S; Mainardi P; Faccioli N Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 15775893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation. Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malignant obstructive jaundice: comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of distal lesions. Di Cesare E; Puglielli E; Michelini O; Pistoi MA; Lombardi L; Rossi M; Barile A; Masciocchi C Radiol Med; 2003; 105(5-6):445-53. PubMed ID: 12949455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive cholangio-pancreatography by breath-hold magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary results. Bearcroft PW; Gimson A; Lomas DJ Clin Radiol; 1997 May; 52(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 9171787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US. Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought. Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital. Rahman R; Ju J; Shamma's J; Goebel S; Sundaram U W V Med J; 2010; 106(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 21739880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at 0.5 T: technique optimisation and preliminary results. Pavone P; Laghi A; Catalano C; Broglia L; Messina A; Scipioni A; Di Girolamo M; Passariello R Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 8797971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct]. Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Stiris MG; Tennøe B; Aadland E; Lunde OC Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 10866083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]