These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10460385)

  • 41. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study.
    Scaffidi MG; Luigiano C; Consolo P; Pellicano R; Giacobbe G; Gaeta M; Blandino A; Familiari L
    Minerva Med; 2009 Oct; 100(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 19910887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique.
    Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Tang Y; Urata J; Sumi S; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1449-54. PubMed ID: 9168706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography.
    Schmidt S; Chevallier P; Novellas S; Gelsi E; Vanbiervliet G; Tran A; Schnyder P; Bruneton JN
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 16941091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].
    Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
    Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
    Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
    Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
    Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
    Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction.
    Georgopoulos SK; Schwartz LH; Jarnagin WR; Gerdes H; Breite I; Fong Y; Blumgart LH; Kurtz RC
    Arch Surg; 1999 Sep; 134(9):1002-7. PubMed ID: 10487597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
    Hjartarson JH; Hannesson P; Sverrisson I; Blöndal S; Ívarsson B; Björnsson ES
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 27181286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of suspected choledocholithiasis.
    Sharma SK; Larson KA; Adler Z; Goldfarb MA
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):868-71. PubMed ID: 12618941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain.
    Farrell RJ; Noonan N; Mahmud N; Morrin MM; Kelleher D; Keeling PW
    Endoscopy; 2001 Aug; 33(8):668-75. PubMed ID: 11490382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis.
    Sica GT; Braver J; Cooney MJ; Miller FH; Chai JL; Adams DF
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 10207456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Diagnostic role of secretin-enhanced MRCP in patients with unsuccessful ERCP.
    Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 10(20):3034-8. PubMed ID: 15378788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Lee MG; Lee HJ; Kim MH; Kang EM; Kim YH; Lee SG; Kim PN; Ha HK; Auh YH
    Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):663-9. PubMed ID: 9051013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Value of MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis in symptomatic patients: one-year experience with a standardized high resolution breath-hold technique].
    Brisbois D; Plomteux O; Nchimi A; Hock D; Dupont P; Delforge M; Bastens B; Weerts J; Magotteaux P
    JBR-BTR; 2001; 84(6):258-61. PubMed ID: 11822367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Kaltenthaler E; Vergel YB; Chilcott J; Thomas S; Blakeborough T; Walters SJ; Bouchier H
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Mar; 8(10):iii, 1-89. PubMed ID: 14982656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pitfalls of MRCP in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction.
    Kamisawa T; Okamoto T
    JOP; 2004 Nov; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 15536287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
    Ward WH; Fluke LM; Hoagland BD; Zarow GJ; Held JM; Ricca RL
    Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures.
    Rösch T; Meining A; Frühmorgen S; Zillinger C; Schusdziarra V; Hellerhoff K; Classen M; Helmberger H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jun; 55(7):870-6. PubMed ID: 12024143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP.
    Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.