These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10460385)

  • 61. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
    Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
    Chan YL; Chan AC; Lam WW; Lee DW; Chung SS; Sung JJ; Cheung HS; Li AK; Metreweli C
    Radiology; 1996 Jul; 200(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 8657949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study.
    Adamek HE; Albert J; Breer H; Weitz M; Schilling D; Riemann JF
    Lancet; 2000 Jul; 356(9225):190-3. PubMed ID: 10963196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis.
    Srinivasa S; Sammour T; McEntee B; Davis N; Hill AG
    Can J Surg; 2010 Dec; 53(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 21092433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
    Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Suzuki M; Sekino Y; Hosono K; Yamamoto K; Kawana K; Nagase H; Kubota K; Nakajima A
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 34784076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [MRI cholangiography with rapid spin-echo technique: prospective evaluation of 20 patients].
    Rondeau Y; Soyer P; Meduri B; Spelle L; Gouhiri M; Aubert A; Scherrer A; Rymer R
    J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 79(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 9757232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP?
    Cavdar F; Yildar M; Tellioğlu G; Kara M; Tilki M; Titiz Mİ
    Pancreatology; 2014; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
    Mesihović R; Mehmedović A
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2019 Feb; 16(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30256060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging?
    Shanmugam V; Beattie GC; Yule SR; Reid W; Loudon MA
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Oct; 78(934):888-93. PubMed ID: 16177010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
    Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW
    Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction.
    Adamek HE; Albert J; Weitz M; Breer H; Schilling D; Riemann JF
    Gut; 1998 Nov; 43(5):680-3. PubMed ID: 9824351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Usefulness and limitation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with hepatolithiasis].
    Park DH; Kim MH; Lee SS; Kim SY; Kim JH; Kim HJ; Bae JS; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim AY; Kim TK; Min YI
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2003 Nov; 42(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 14646580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
    Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of common bile duct and pancreatic duct pathologies.
    Kumar A; Mohanty NR; Mohanty M; Dash S
    Front Med Technol; 2023; 5():946555. PubMed ID: 37521722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.
    Textor HJ; Flacke S; Pauleit D; Keller E; Neubrand M; Terjung B; Gieseke J; Scheurlen C; Sauerbruch T; Schild HH
    Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):984-90. PubMed ID: 12471543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with a long-echo-train fast spin-echo sequence and a surface coil in chronic pancreatitis.
    Takehara Y; Ichijo K; Tooyama N; Kodaira N; Yamamoto H; Tatami M; Saito M; Watahiki H; Takahashi M
    Radiology; 1994 Jul; 192(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 8208969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
    Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The role of 99mTc mebrofenin hepatobiliary scanning in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease.
    Iqbal M; Aggarwal S; Kumar R; Garg PK; Bandhu S; Kumar A; Parshad R; Guleria S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Mar; 25(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 15094448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
    Badger WR; Borgert AJ; Kallies KJ; Kothari SN
    Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.