These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1986 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10460813)

  • 1. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Hochman JS; Sleeper LA; Webb JG; Sanborn TA; White HD; Talley JD; Buller CE; Jacobs AK; Slater JN; Col J; McKinlay SM; LeJemtel TH
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Aug; 341(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 10460813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
    Sleeper LA; Ramanathan K; Picard MH; Lejemtel TH; White HD; Dzavik V; Tormey D; Avis NE; Hochman JS;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16022953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial.
    White HD; Assmann SF; Sanborn TA; Jacobs AK; Webb JG; Sleeper LA; Wong CK; Stewart JT; Aylward PE; Wong SC; Hochman JS
    Circulation; 2005 Sep; 112(13):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 16186436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of thrombolytic therapy, with or without intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, on 12-month survival in the SHOCK trial.
    French JK; Feldman HA; Assmann SF; Sanborn T; Palmeri ST; Miller D; Boland J; Buller CE; Steingart R; Sleeper LA; Hochman JS;
    Am Heart J; 2003 Nov; 146(5):804-10. PubMed ID: 14597928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary angioplasty for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
    Calton R; Jaison TM; David T
    Indian Heart J; 1999; 51(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10327779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and delayed revascularization for myocardial infarction and shock in the absence of primary angioplasty: a treatment strategy with or without thrombolysis?
    Drakos SG; Anastasiou-Nana MI; Terrovitis JV; Tsagalou EP; Kanakakis J; Ntalianis A; Lazaris N; Maroulidis G; Venetsanakos J; Bonios M; Nanas JN
    Coron Artery Dis; 2008 Nov; 19(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 18923249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome of patients aged >or=75 years in the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK (SHOCK) trial: do elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock respond differently to emergent revascularization?
    Dzavik V; Sleeper LA; Picard MH; Sanborn TA; Lowe AM; Gin K; Saucedo J; Webb JG; Menon V; Slater JN; Hochman JS;
    Am Heart J; 2005 Jun; 149(6):1128-34. PubMed ID: 15976798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interhospital transfer for early revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock--a report from the SHould we revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial and registry.
    Jeger RV; Tseng CH; Hochman JS; Bates ER
    Am Heart J; 2006 Oct; 152(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 16996836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].
    Fornaro G; Prando MD; Parodi F; Cordero G; Sansa M; Bongo AS; Campi A; Aralda D; Dellavesa P; Aina F; Lazzero M; Cernigliaro C
    G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1385-99. PubMed ID: 9162668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Racial and ethnic differences in the treatment and outcome of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.
    Palmeri ST; Lowe AM; Sleeper LA; Saucedo JF; Desvigne-Nickens P; Hochman JS;
    Am J Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 96(8):1042-9. PubMed ID: 16214435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Coronary angioplasty for primary cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction].
    Badaoui G; Sarkis A; Azar R; Kassab R; Salamé E; Aboujaoudé S
    J Med Liban; 2005; 53(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 16836021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Dunning J; Thornley AR; Sutton AG; Muir DF; Wright RA; Hall JA; de Belder MA
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in cardiogenic shock: report from the SHOCK Study. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?
    Carnendran L; Abboud R; Sleeper LA; Gurunathan R; Webb JG; Menon V; Dzavik V; Cocke T; Hochman JS
    Eur Heart J; 2001 Mar; 22(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 11237542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
    Abdel-Wahab M; Saad M; Kynast J; Geist V; Sherif MA; Richardt G; Toelg R
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 105(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 20346314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients.
    Dzavík V; Burton JR; Kee C; Teo KK; Ignaszewski A; Lucas AR; Tymchak WJ
    Can J Cardiol; 1998 Jul; 14(7):923-30. PubMed ID: 9706277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocardiographic findings in cardiogenic shock, risk prediction, and the effects of emergency revascularization: results from the SHOCK trial.
    White HD; Palmeri ST; Sleeper LA; French JK; Wong CK; Lowe AM; Crapo JW; Koller PT; Baran KW; Boland JL; Hochman JS; Wagner GS;
    Am Heart J; 2004 Nov; 148(5):810-7. PubMed ID: 15523311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability to achieve complete revascularization is associated with improved in-hospital survival in cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: Manitoba cardiogenic SHOCK Registry investigators.
    Hussain F; Philipp RK; Ducas RA; Elliott J; Džavík V; Jassal DS; Tam JW; Roberts D; Garber PJ; Ducas J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Oct; 78(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 21547996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.
    Barron HV; Every NR; Parsons LS; Angeja B; Goldberg RJ; Gore JM; Chou TM;
    Am Heart J; 2001 Jun; 141(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 11376306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left ventricular assist device implantation after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: a two-center study.
    Dang NC; Topkara VK; Leacche M; John R; Byrne JG; Naka Y
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 130(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 16153915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: The Henry Ford Hospital experience and review of the literature.
    Moosvi AR; Gheorghiade M; Goldstein S; Khaja F
    Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1991; 39(3-4):240-4. PubMed ID: 1804830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 100.