465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10460957)
1. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children.
Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 10460957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age.
Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Danielsen B; Nyvad B
Caries Res; 1998; 32(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 9577986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of radiographic occlusal and approximal caries diagnoses made by 240 dentists.
Espelid I; Tveit AB
Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Oct; 59(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 11680647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of approximal caries in pre-school children.
Stecksén-Blicks C; Wahlin YB
Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(5):179-84. PubMed ID: 6581548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population.
Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 15853844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Caries development in a young population managed by a restrictive attitude to radiography and operative intervention: II. A study at the surface level.
Lith A; Lindstrand C; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 12087440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries: a radiographic comparison.
Weerheijm KL; Groen HJ; Bast AJ; Kieft JA; Eijkman MA; van Amerongen WE
Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1423448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters.
Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar in swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age.
Mejàre I; Stenlund H; Julihn A; Larsson I; Permert L
Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 11385197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reproducibility of clinical examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiology for the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.
Peers A; Hill FJ; Mitropoulos CM; Holloway PJ
Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 8402807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening with conventional and digital bite-wing radiography compared to clinical examination alone for caries detection in low-risk children.
Hintze H
Caries Res; 1993; 27(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 8281566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth.
Pitts NB; Rimmer PA
Caries Res; 1992; 26(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 1521308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic outcome of methods frequently used for caries validation. A comparison of clinical examination, radiography and histology following hemisectioning and serial tooth sectioning.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Caries Res; 2003; 37(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 12652049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnosis on posterior teeth of children seen at a Nigerian teaching hospital.
Popoola BO; Denloye OO; Ajayi DM; Sote EO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 39(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 20632671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of cavitated carious lesions in approximal tooth surfaces by ultrasonic caries detector.
Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Calderon S; Mittleman A; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 17178503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic Yield for Clinical Caries Diagnosis in Young Adults: Indicators for Radiographic Examination.
Carvalho JC; Mestrinho HD; Guillet A; Maltz M
Caries Res; 2020; 54(2):154-164. PubMed ID: 32101874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of approximal caries by clinical and radiographic examination in 9-year-old Swedish children.
Lillehagen M; Grindefjord M; Mejàre I
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 17426396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
