These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10460962)

  • 1. A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 10460962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries: effect of X-ray beam factors on diagnosis.
    Ricketts D; Kidd E; Smith B; Wilson R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 8603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children.
    Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 10460957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
    Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening with conventional and digital bite-wing radiography compared to clinical examination alone for caries detection in low-risk children.
    Hintze H
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 8281566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar in swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age.
    Mejàre I; Stenlund H; Julihn A; Larsson I; Permert L
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 11385197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reproducibility of clinical examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiology for the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.
    Peers A; Hill FJ; Mitropoulos CM; Holloway PJ
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 8402807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Caries development in a young population managed by a restrictive attitude to radiography and operative intervention: II. A study at the surface level.
    Lith A; Lindstrand C; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 12087440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
    White SC; Yoon DC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jun; 21(6):530-2, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 11199671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of three diagnostic methods for initial proximal caries detection in primary molars.
    Waly NG
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1441-9. PubMed ID: 9497695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical methods in occlusal caries diagnosis: An in vitro comparison with visual inspection and bite-wing radiography.
    Huysmans MC; Longbottom C; Pitts N
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 9701656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of caries in permanent first molars adjacent to primary second molars with interproximal caries: four-year prospective radiographic study.
    Vanderas AP; Kavvadia K; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 15344633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
    Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
    Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.