BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10461333)

  • 1. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10461333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 8(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 8915087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
    Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors.
    Källén K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 12493044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy.
    Nakling J; Buhaug H; Backe B
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 Oct; 81(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 16084037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of the day of delivery by the use of ultrasound.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 11(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 9549835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate?
    Rowlands S; Royston P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Aug; 43(373):322-5. PubMed ID: 8251215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of ultrasound-to-delivery interval and maternal-fetal characteristics on validity of estimated fetal weight.
    Cohen JM; Hutcheon JA; Kramer MS; Joseph KS; Abenhaim H; Platt RW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 20069655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia.
    Colvin J; Bower C; Dickinson JE; Sokol J
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):e356-63. PubMed ID: 16140678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
    Dietz PM; England LJ; Callaghan WM; Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():62-71. PubMed ID: 17803619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards.
    Lackman F; Capewell V; Richardson B; daSilva O; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):946-53. PubMed ID: 11303203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
    Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determination of the expected day of delivery--ultrasound has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method].
    Olsen O; Clausen JA
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar; 160(14):2088-90. PubMed ID: 9604677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Growth discordance in dichorionic twin pregnancies: risk factors, diagnosis and management].
    Audibert F; Boullier M; Kerbrat V; Vial M; Boithias C; Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Feb; 31(1 Suppl):2S15-24. PubMed ID: 11973515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beneficial effects of breast milk in the neonatal intensive care unit on the developmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months of age.
    Vohr BR; Poindexter BB; Dusick AM; McKinley LT; Wright LL; Langer JC; Poole WK;
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jul; 118(1):e115-23. PubMed ID: 16818526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adequacy of prenatal care and pregnancy outcome.
    Krueger PM; Scholl TO
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Aug; 100(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 10979253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Hod M; Bar J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Feb; 130(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 16720074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vitamin K antagonists and pregnancy outcome. A multi-centre prospective study.
    Schaefer C; Hannemann D; Meister R; Eléfant E; Paulus W; Vial T; Reuvers M; Robert-Gnansia E; Arnon J; De Santis M; Clementi M; Rodriguez-Pinilla E; Dolivo A; Merlob P
    Thromb Haemost; 2006 Jun; 95(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 16732373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.
    Jackson RA; Gibson KA; Wu YW; Croughan MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):551-63. PubMed ID: 14990421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.