These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10461975)
1. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance. Gomez-Raya L; Klemetsdal G J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):2008-18. PubMed ID: 10461975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential gain from optimizing multigeneration selection on an identified quantitative trait locus. Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2975-90. PubMed ID: 11811450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance. Verrier E Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 11268312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding. Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector. Van Eenennaam AL; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):307-20. PubMed ID: 21262975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers. Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal selection on two quantitative trait loci with linkage. Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R; Moreau L Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 12081806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking. Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 20536636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of marker-assisted selection under different initial frequency of QTL favorable allele. Lu SX; Wu CX; Lian LS Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 30(8):750-4. PubMed ID: 14682244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle. Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linkage disequilibrium and selection response in two-stage marker-assisted selection of dairy cattle over several generations. Schulman NF; Dentine MR J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Apr; 122(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16130477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing purebred selection for crossbred performance using QTL with different degrees of dominance. Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(3):297-324. PubMed ID: 15107268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix. Tiezzi F; Maltecca C Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs. Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd. Belonsky GM; Kennedy BW J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 3397339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]