150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10462187)
1. Caffeine and stroop interference.
Kenemans JL; Wieleman JS; Zeegers M; Verbaten MN
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Aug; 63(4):589-98. PubMed ID: 10462187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of caffeine, practice, and mode of presentation on Stroop task performance.
Edwards S; Brice C; Craig C; Penri-Jones R
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1996 Jun; 54(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 8743589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reverse Stroop effect.
Durgin FH
Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Mar; 7(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 10780025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location.
Stuss DT; Floden D; Alexander MP; Levine B; Katz D
Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):771-86. PubMed ID: 11369401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span.
Uttl B; Graf P
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Jun; 19(3):405-20. PubMed ID: 9268815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of caffeine on visual evoked potential (P300) and neuromotor performance.
Deslandes AC; Veiga H; Cagy M; Piedade R; Pompeu F; Ribeiro P
Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2004 Jun; 62(2B):385-90. PubMed ID: 15273831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Caffeine deprivation state modulates coffee consumption but not attentional bias for caffeine-related stimuli.
Stafford LD; Yeomans MR
Behav Pharmacol; 2005 Nov; 16(7):559-71. PubMed ID: 16170233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive control in children: stroop interference and suppression of word reading.
Bub DN; Masson ME; Lalonde CE
Psychol Sci; 2006 Apr; 17(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 16623694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Interference in the Stroop color-naming task].
Yamazaki A
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1985 Oct; 56(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 4094196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidental learning of incongruent items in a manual version of the Stroop task.
Lemercier C
Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):705-16. PubMed ID: 19725307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High doses of caffeine impair performance of a numerical version of the Stroop task in men.
Foreman N; Barraclough S; Moore C; Mehta A; Madon M
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Feb; 32(2):399-403. PubMed ID: 2726998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of caffeine on anticipatory control processes: evidence from a cued task-switch paradigm.
Tieges Z; Snel J; Kok A; Plat N; Ridderinkhof R
Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):561-78. PubMed ID: 17539921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation.
Lansbergen MM; Kenemans JL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2247-54. PubMed ID: 18762447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociations between motor timing, motor coordination, and time perception after the administration of alcohol or caffeine.
Terry P; Doumas M; Desai RI; Wing AM
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Mar; 202(4):719-29. PubMed ID: 18846366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Color priming affects Stroop interference.
McClain L
Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 6866673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Features of Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference: analysis by response modality and evaluation.
Ikeda Y; Hirata S; Okuzumi H; Kokubun M
Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):654-60. PubMed ID: 20499573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
