425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10463000)
1. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.
Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma.
Hutchinson ML; Zahniser DJ; Sherman ME; Herrero R; Alfaro M; Bratti MC; Hildesheim A; Lorincz AT; Greenberg MD; Morales J; Schiffman M
Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep Pap tests and conventional Papanicolaou smears on the basis of the histologic diagnosis: a clinical study of women with cervical abnormalities.
Park IA; Lee SN; Chae SW; Park KH; Kim JW; Lee HP
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 11480713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy.
Bernstein SJ; Sanchez-Ramos L; Ndubisi B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 185(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 11518884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new look at cervical cytology. ThinPrep multicenter trial results.
Hutchinson ML; Agarwal P; Denault T; Berger B; Cibas ES
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 1636340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved Accuracy for Cervical Cytology with the ThinPrep Method and the Endocervical Brush-Spatula Collection Procedure.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Hutchinson ML
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jan; 2(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 25951356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey.
Abulafia O; Pezzullo JC; Sherer DM
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12821354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system.
Bolick DR; Hellman DJ
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9479342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution.
Tuncer ZS; Başaran M; Sezgin Y; Firat P; Mocan Kuzey G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 16398228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytologic features of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in thinprep papanicolaou test slides and conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Dubray-Benstein B; Haja J; Hughes JH;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jan; 129(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15628904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study: conventional cervical and ThinPrep Pap tests in a routine clinical setting.
Grace A; McBrearty P; Troost S; Thornhill M; Kay E; Leader M
Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 12269892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
