These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10464808)

  • 21. MR imaging of the wrist: comparison between 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging--preliminary experience.
    Saupe N; Prüssmann KP; Luechinger R; Bösiger P; Marincek B; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 15550374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T.
    Akisik FM; Sandrasegaran K; Aisen AM; Lin C; Lall C
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(5):1433-44; discussion 1462-4. PubMed ID: 17848701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. MRI artifact reduction and quality improvement in the upper abdomen with PROPELLER and prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique.
    Hirokawa Y; Isoda H; Maetani YS; Arizono S; Shimada K; Togashi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 191(4):1154-8. PubMed ID: 18806158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Qualitative comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI in the evaluation of epilepsy.
    Phal PM; Usmanov A; Nesbit GM; Anderson JC; Spencer D; Wang P; Helwig JA; Roberts C; Hamilton BE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):890-5. PubMed ID: 18716125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic contrast-enhanced renal MRI at 7 Tesla: preliminary results.
    Umutlu L; Kraff O; Orzada S; Fischer A; Kinner S; Maderwald S; Antoch G; Quick HH; Forsting M; Ladd ME; Lauenstein TC
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):425-33. PubMed ID: 21317791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.
    Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging.
    Hauger O; Dumont E; Chateil JF; Moinard M; Diard F
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 12202695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of wrist MRI at 3.0T: comparison between isotropic 3D turbo spin echo and isotropic 3D fast field echo and 2D turbo spin echo.
    Jung JY; Yoon YC; Jung JY; Choe BK
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Apr; 54(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 23319720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MRI of the spine: image quality and normal-neoplastic bone marrow contrast at 3 T versus 1.5 T.
    Zhao J; Krug R; Xu D; Lu Y; Link TM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):873-80. PubMed ID: 19304689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degenerative cartilage.
    Rubenstein JD; Li JG; Majumdar S; Henkelman RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9308470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Liver metastases: optimization of MR imaging pulse sequences at 1.0 T.
    Paling MR; Abbitt PL; Mugler JP; Brookeman JR
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 3363125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T.
    Briellmann RS; Pell GS; Wellard RM; Mitchell LA; Abbott DF; Jackson GD
    Epileptic Disord; 2003 Mar; 5(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 12773291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.
    Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
    Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
    Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Catasca JV; Mirowitz SA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 8273691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint in dogs and cats. Effect of different coils on image quality].
    Gäbler K; Brühschwein A; Loderstedt S; Oechtering G; Ludewig E
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011; 39(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 22143585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-resolution MRI of the human parotid gland and duct at 7 Tesla.
    Kraff O; Theysohn JM; Maderwald S; Kokulinsky PC; Dogan Z; Kerem A; Kruszona S; Ladd ME; Gizewski ER; Ladd SC
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):518-24. PubMed ID: 19652615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.
    Masi JN; Sell CA; Phan C; Han E; Newitt D; Steinbach L; Majumdar S; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 15987970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.