BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10464947)

  • 1. The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision.
    Pollatsek A; Perea M; Binder KS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1142-58. PubMed ID: 10464947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: evidence with transposed-letter neighbors.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Cognition; 2008 Jul; 108(1):290-300. PubMed ID: 18374323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quiet clam is quite calm: transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading.
    Johnson RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):943-69. PubMed ID: 19586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words.
    Huang HW; Lee CY; Tsai JL; Lee CL; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    Neuroreport; 2006 Jul; 17(10):1061-5. PubMed ID: 16791104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision.
    Sears CR; Campbell CR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1040-62. PubMed ID: 16846296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: an eye-movement study.
    Hutzler F; Conrad M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Lang; 2005 Feb; 92(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 15629488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors.
    Perea M; Acha J; Fraga I
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):199-210. PubMed ID: 17905425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing for lexical competition during reading: fast priming with orthographic neighbors.
    Nakayama M; Sears CR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):477-92. PubMed ID: 20364931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
    Samson D; Pillon A
    Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading.
    Binder KS; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1162-72. PubMed ID: 10464948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?
    Liversedge SP; Rayner K; White SJ; Vergilino-Perez D; Findlay JM; Kentridge RW
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):1013-24. PubMed ID: 15031094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.