These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10464947)

  • 21. Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading.
    Williams CC; Perea M; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1072-82. PubMed ID: 16846298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision.
    Perea M; Pollatsek A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):767-79. PubMed ID: 9627415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
    Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.
    Davis CJ; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):668-87. PubMed ID: 16822131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):954-9. PubMed ID: 16262491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.
    Lavidor M; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2002 Jan; 80(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 11817889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Orthographic neighborhood effects in the right but not in the left cerebral hemisphere.
    Lavidor M; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2002 Jan; 80(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 11817890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading.
    Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 22329788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements.
    Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1969-75. PubMed ID: 19968447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.
    Lavidor M; Walsh V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12729488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lexical restructuring in the absence of literacy.
    Venturaa P; Kolinsky R; Fernandesa S; Queridoa L; Morais J
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):334-61. PubMed ID: 17113063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
    Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
    Dare N; Shillcock R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Processing difficulty while reading words with neighbors is not due to increased foveal load: Evidence from eye movements.
    Johnson RL; Slattery TJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1360-1374. PubMed ID: 38532237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.