152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10465020)
1. Cell kinetic studies in mouse tongue mucosa by autoradiographic, immunohistochemical and flow cytometric techniques.
Dörr W; Arui J; Beisker W; Schultz-Hector S
Cell Prolif; 1994 Jun; 27(6):321-32. PubMed ID: 10465020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of isotopic and immunohistochemical methods of studying epithelial cell proliferation in hamster tongue.
Warnakulasuriya KA; Johnson NW
Cell Prolif; 1993 Nov; 26(6):545-55. PubMed ID: 9116121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The labelling index of human and mouse tumours assessed by bromodeoxyuridine staining in vitro and in vivo and flow cytometry.
Wilson GD; McNally NJ; Dunphy E; Kärcher H; Pfragner R
Cytometry; 1985 Nov; 6(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 4064843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of BrdUrd and [3H]TdR incorporation to estimate cell proliferation, cell loss, and potential doubling time in tumor xenografts.
Zätterström UK; Johansson M; Källén A; Baldetorp B; Oredsson S; Wennerberg J; Killander D
Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):872-9. PubMed ID: 1459003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cell kinetic analysis of murine squamous cell carcinomas: a comparison of single versus double labelling using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry.
Schultz-Hector S; Begg AC; Hofland I; Kummermehr J; Sund M
Br J Cancer; 1993 Dec; 68(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 8260360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between bromodeoxyuridine and 3H thymidine labeling in human breast tumors.
Waldman FM; Chew K; Ljung BM; Goodson W; Hom J; Duarte LA; Smith HS; Mayall B
Mod Pathol; 1991 Nov; 4(6):718-22. PubMed ID: 1724086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow cytometric measurement of cell cycle kinetics in rat Walker-256 carcinoma following in vivo and in vitro pulse labelling with bromodeoxyuridine.
Fogt F; Wan J; O'Hara C; Bistrian BR; Blackburn GL; Istfan NW
Cytometry; 1991; 12(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 1825629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cell kinetics in human malignancies studied with in vivo administration of bromodeoxyuridine and flow cytometry.
Riccardi A; Danova M; Wilson G; Ucci G; Dörmer P; Mazzini G; Brugnatelli S; Girino M; McNally NJ; Ascari E
Cancer Res; 1988 Nov; 48(21):6238-45. PubMed ID: 3167869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cell kinetics in mouse epidermis studied by bivariate DNA/bromodeoxyuridine and DNA/keratin flow cytometry.
Kirkhus B; Clausen OP
Cytometry; 1990; 11(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 1690627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cycling S-phase cells in animal and spontaneous tumours. I. Comparison of the BrdUrd and 3H-thymidine techniques and flow cytometry for the estimation of S-phase frequency.
Langer EM; Röttgers HR; Schliermann MG; Meier EM; Miltenburger HG; Schumann J; Göhde W
Acta Radiol Oncol; 1985; 24(6):545-8. PubMed ID: 3006444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA-synthesizing cells in oral epithelium have a range of cell cycle durations: evidence from double-labelling studies using tritiated thymidine and bromodeoxyuridine.
Hume WJ
Cell Tissue Kinet; 1989 Sep; 22(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 2611853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abnormal DNA synthesis in polyamine deficient cells revealed by bromodeoxyuridine-flow cytometry technique.
Fredlund JO; Johansson M; Baldetorp B; Oredsson SM
Cell Prolif; 1994 May; 27(5):243-56. PubMed ID: 10465009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immunohistochemical detection of bromodeoxyuridine in formalin-fixed tissues.
Sugihara H; Hattori T; Fukuda M
Histochemistry; 1986; 85(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 3528078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry for localization of S-phase cells in decalcified tissues. A comparative study with tritiated thymidine autoradiography.
Apte SS
Histochem J; 1990 Aug; 22(8):401-8. PubMed ID: 2228729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tissue kinetics in mouse tongue mucosa during daily fractionated radiotherapy.
Dörr W; Emmendörfer H; Weber-Frisch M
Cell Prolif; 1996 Sep; 29(9):495-504. PubMed ID: 8980656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cell kinetic studies of in situ human brain tumors with bromodeoxyuridine.
Hoshino T; Nagashima T; Murovic J; Levin EM; Levin VA; Rupp SM
Cytometry; 1985 Nov; 6(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 2998714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) staining and BrdUrd-labelling index under different proliferative conditions in vitro by flow cytometry.
Lohr F; Wenz F; Haas S; Flentje M
Cell Prolif; 1995 Feb; 28(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 7893842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Vindelov et al. and bromodeoxyuridine/DNA double-staining flow cytometry methods for analysis of cell cycle distribution in rat thymocytes.
Orfao A; Carbajo S; Dolbeare F; Ciudad J; Lopez A; Carbajo-Perez E
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 8875060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flow cytometric estimation of cell cycle parameters using a monoclonal antibody to bromodeoxyuridine.
Sasaki K; Murakami T; Ogino T; Takahashi M; Kawasaki S
Cytometry; 1986 Jul; 7(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 3089742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double labelling of cells with tritiated thymidine and bromodeoxyuridine reveals a circadian rhythm-dependent variation in duration of DNA synthesis and S phase flux rates in rodent oral epithelium.
Hume WJ; Thompson J
Cell Tissue Kinet; 1990 Jul; 23(4):313-23. PubMed ID: 2202516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
