BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1046552)

  • 1. Prescribing a contraceptive method.
    Sorley AK
    Nurse Pract; 1975; 1(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 1046552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contraception. Helping patients choose.
    Cupit LG
    JOGN Nurs; 1984; 13(2 Suppl):23s-29s. PubMed ID: 6562262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postpartum family planning in private practice: a baseline study.
    Mackenzie P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Nov; 44(5):762-6. PubMed ID: 4473019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Sialkot experience.
    Osborn RW
    Stud Fam Plann; 1974 Apr; 5(4):123-9. PubMed ID: 4826778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fertility regulation technology: status and prospects.
    Segal SJ; Nordberg OS
    Popul Bull; 1977 Mar; 31(6):1-25. PubMed ID: 12335682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contraception.
    Law B
    Trans Med Soc Lond; 1972; 88():184-91. PubMed ID: 4665815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of family planning clients in Bangladesh.
    Swenson I; Khan AR
    Int J Fertil; 1983; 28(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 6140233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of contraceptive methods in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Nakhaee N; Mirahmadizadeh AR; Gorji HA; Mohammadi M
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002 Jan; 8(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15330561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Contraceptive methods for women and men].
    Sievers S; Ludwig G
    Fortschr Med; 1974 Sep; 92(26):1021-9. PubMed ID: 4409052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contraception and family planning: finding the best method. Part one.
    Lippman D
    Nurs Care; 1977 Jul; 10(7):36-8. PubMed ID: 586609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A report on the family planning program in the People's Republic of China.
    Katagiri T
    Stud Fam Plann; 1973 Aug; 4(8):216-8. PubMed ID: 4726003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Family planning program in India: an evaluation.
    Treadway RC; Forrest JE
    Stud Fam Plann; 1973 Jun; 4(6):149-56. PubMed ID: 4736948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Contraception: methods, contraindications, surveillance].
    Lopes P; Mensier A
    Rev Prat; 2000 Feb; 50(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 10748681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Family planning programs: can more be done?
    Rosenfield AG
    Stud Fam Plann; 1974 Apr; 5(4):115-22. PubMed ID: 4826777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organized family planning services in the United States, 1968-1976.
    Torres A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1978; 10(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 639969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birth control update for childbirth educators.
    Livingston C
    Int J Childbirth Educ; 1992 Feb; 7(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 12345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Contraception and contraceptive methods].
    Rodriguez De Francisco E
    Profamilia; 1988; ():51-4. PubMed ID: 12284489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure rates of contraceptive methods.
    Mclure Z
    Fam Plann Inf Serv; 1981 Apr; 1(6):59-61. PubMed ID: 12263458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Family planning democratized.
    Manisoff M
    Am J Nurs; 1975 Oct; 75(10):1660-6. PubMed ID: 1041539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Comparison with other contraceptive methods available in the United States.
    Ashraf T; Arnold SB; Maxfield M
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):791-8. PubMed ID: 7837126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.